RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Infection and transmission risks in schools and contribution to the COVID-19 pandemic in Germany – a retrospective observational study using nation-wide and regional health and education agency notification data
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2022.01.18.22269200
DO 10.1101/2022.01.18.22269200
A1 Heinsohn, Torben
A1 Lange, Berit
A1 Vanella, Patrizio
A1 Rodiah, Isti
A1 Glöckner, Stephan
A1 Joachim, Alexander
A1 Becker, Dennis
A1 Brändle, Tobias
A1 Dhein, Stefan
A1 Ehehalt, Stefan
A1 Fries, Mira
A1 Galante-Gottschalk, Annette
A1 Jehnichen, Stefanie
A1 Kolkmann, Sarah
A1 Kossow, Annelene
A1 Hellmich, Martin
A1 Dötsch, Jörg
A1 Krause, Gérard
YR 2022
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2022/01/21/2022.01.18.22269200.abstract
AB Introduction Currently, information on infection and transmission risks of students and teachers in schools, the effect of infection control measures for schools as well as the contribution of schools to the overall population transmission of SARS-CoV-2 in Germany are limited to regional data sets restricted to short phases of the pandemic.Methods We used German federal state (NUTS-2) and county (NUTS-3) data from national and regional public health and education agencies to assess infection risk and secondary attack rates (SARs) from March 2020 to October 2021 in Germany. We used multiple regression analysis and infection dynamic modelling, accounting for urbanity, socioeconomic factors, local population infection dynamics and age-specific underdetection to investigate the effects of infection control measures.Results We included (1) nation-wide NUTS-2 level data from calendar weeks (W) 46-50/2020 and W08-40/2021 with 304676 infections in students and 32992 in teachers; (2) NUTS-3 level data from W09-25/2021 with 85788 student and 9427 teacher infections and (3) detailed data from 5 regions covering W09/2020 to W27/2021 with 12814 infections, 43238 contacts and 4165 secondary cases for students (for teachers 14801, 5893 and 472 respectively).In counties with mandatory surgical mask wearing during class in all schools infection risk of students and teachers was reduced by 56/100.000 persons per 14 days and by 30% and 24% relative to the population respectively. Overall contribution to population infections of contacts in school settings was 2-13%. It was lowest during school closures and vacation and highest during normal presence class intervals. Infection risk for students increased with age and was similar to or lower than the population risk during second and third waves in Germany and higher in summer 2021. Infection risk of teachers was higher than the population during the second wave and similar or lower thereafter with stricter measures in place. SARs for students and staff were below 5% in schools throughout the study period. SARs in households more than doubled from 14% W21-39/2020 to 29-33% in W08-23/2021. Most contacts were reported for schools, yet most secondary cases originated in households. In schools, staff predominantly infected staff and students predominantly infected students.Conclusion Open schools under hygiene measures and testing strategies contribute up to 13% of nation-wide infections in Germany and as little as 2% during vacations/school closures. Tighter infection control measures stabilised school SARs whilst household SARs more than doubled as more transmissible variants became prevalent in Germany. Mandatory mask wearing during class in all school types effectively reduces secondary transmission in schools, as do reduced attendance class models.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis project received financial support by the Standing Conference of Ministers of Education and Cultural Affairs (KMK) in Germany. TH, BL, PV, IR, and GK received funding from the European Union?s Horizon 2020 research and innovation program (101003480 Project CORESMA) and from the Initiative and Networking Fund of the Helmholtz Association. BL and SG received funding from the BMBF Netzwerk fur Universitatsmedizin (NaFOUniMedCovid19, FKZ: 01KX202 Project COVIM). AJ, JD received funding from the BMBF (Bundesweites Forschungsnetz ?Angewandte Surveillance und Testung? (B-FAST) AP5: Anwendungsbereich Schulen und Kitas). The funders had no role in study design, analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript. The KMK was presented with the study design for funding approval and provided data for analysis. KMK: https://www.kmk.org/kmk/information-in-english.html EU Horizon 2020: https://ec.europa.eu/programmes/horizon2020/en/homez Helmholtz Association Initiative and Networking Fund: https://www.helmholtz.de/en/about-us/structure-and-governance/initiating-and-networking/ BMBF: https://www.bmbf.de/bmbf/de/home/home_node.htmlAuthor DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:Ethics approval was given by the IRB of the Medical University Hannover (Ethical approval 9609_BO_K_2021, Hannover).I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.Yes(1) All population infection data is publicly available from the RKI at: https://survstat.rki.de/Default.aspx (1) KMK federal state data is publicly available at: https://www.kmk.org/dokumentation-statistik/statistik/schulstatistik/schulstatistische-informationen-zur-covid-19-pandemie.html (2) KMK county-level data is not publicly available. Data can be obtained on request by contacting the KMK directly at: https://www.kmk.org/kmk/information-in-english/contact.html (3) Regional health and education authority data was obtained through data sharing agreements as specified in the approved ethics protocol directly from the multiple government agencies. Data is based on public health notification records and case-specific data collected in the notification and contact-tracing process. Data can be obtained on request. Interested parties may contact the corresponding author, who will provide points of contact for the relevant agencies. Signature of a data sharing agreement or data sharing addendum with Helmholtz Centre for Infection Research and/or the providing government agency will be required. Data availability is subject to approval by the providing agency. Agencies include the health agencies of Cologne https://www.stadtkoeln.de/service/adressen/00112/index.html Stuttgart https://welcome.stuttgart.de/item/show/547988/1/dept/1475?site=welcomecenter Altenburger Land https://www.altenburgerland.de/sixcms/detail.php?id=11267&_lang=de Konstanz https://www.lrakn.de/service-und-verwaltung/aemter/gesundheit+und+versorgung/gesundheitsamt Gutersloh https://service.kreis-guetersloh.de/detailansicht/-/egov-bis-detail/einrichtung/332/show Bautzen https://www.landkreis-bautzen.de/landratsamt/organisation/gesundheitsamt/46 and the education agency of Hamburg https://www.hamburg.de/bsb/