RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Graph Theoretical Measures of Fast Ripples Support the Epileptic Network Hypothesis
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2022.01.20.22269492
DO 10.1101/2022.01.20.22269492
A1 Weiss, Shennan A
A1 Pastore, Tomas
A1 Orosz, Iren
A1 Rubinstein, Daniel
A1 Gorniak, Richard
A1 Waldman, Zachary
A1 Fried, Itzhak
A1 Wu, Chengyuan
A1 Sharan, Ashwini
A1 Slezak, Diego
A1 Worrell, Gregory
A1 Engel, Jerome
A1 Sperling, Michael R.
A1 Staba, Richard J
YR 2022
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2022/01/21/2022.01.20.22269492.abstract
AB The epileptic network hypothesis and epileptogenic zone (EZ) hypothesis are two theories of ictogenesis. The network hypothesis posits that coordinated activity among interconnected nodes produces seizures. The EZ hypothesis posits that distinct regions are necessary and sufficient for seizure generation. High-frequency oscillations (HFOs), and particularly fast ripples (FR), are thought to be biomarkers of the EZ. We sought to test these theories by comparing HFO rates and networks in surgical responders and non-responders, with no appreciable change in seizure frequency or severity, within a retrospective cohort of 48 patients implanted with stereo-EEG electrodes. We recorded inter-ictal activity during non-rapid eye movement sleep and semi- automatically detected and quantified HFOs. Each electrode contact was localized in normalized coordinates. We found that the accuracy of seizure-onset zone (SOZ) electrode contact classification using HFO rates (ripples 80-250 Hz, and FR 250-600 Hz) was not significantly different in surgical responders and non-responders, suggesting that in non-responders the EZ partially encompassed the SOZ(s) (p>0.05). We also found that in the responders, FR on oscillations exhibited a higher spectral content in the SOZ compared to the non-SOZ (p<1e-5). In contrast, in the non-responders the FR had a lower spectral content in the SOZ (p<1e-5). We constructed two different networks of FR with a spectral content > 350 Hz. The first was a rate- distance network that multiplied the Euclidian distance between FR generating contacts by the average rate of FR in the two contacts. The radius of the rate-distance network, which excluded SOZ nodes, discriminated non-responders, including patients not offered resection or responsive neurostimulation (RNS) due to diffuse multi-focal onsets, with an accuracy of 0.77 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.56-0.98]. The second FR network was constructed using the mutual information (MI) between the timing of the events to measure functional connectivity. For most non-responders, this network had a longer characteristic path length, lower mean local efficiency in the non-SOZ, and a higher nodal strength among non-SOZ nodes relative to SOZ nodes. The graphical theoretical measures from the rate-distance and MI networks of 22 non-RNS treated patients was used to train a support vector machine, which when tested on 13 distinct patients classified non-responders with an accuracy of 0.92 [95% CI 0.75-1]. These results support the epileptic network hypothesis, refute the EZ hypothesis, and suggest that surgical non-responders, and patients not selected for resection or RNS, exhibit a decentralized FR network consisting of widely distributed, hyperexcitable FR generating nodes.Abbreviated Summary Weiss et al., report that fast ripples form a correlational network. In poor epilepsy surgery candidates, and patients that don’t respond to surgery, the networks are widespread, highly active, and decentralized. This can be used to plan effective surgeries and supports the theory that seizures require a coordinated epileptic network.Graphical abstractCompeting Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis work was fully supported by NIH K23 NS094633, a Junior Investigator Award from the American Epilepsy Society (SAW), R01 NS106958 (RS), and R01 NS033310 (JE). The views, opinions, and/or findings contained in this material are those of the authors and should not be interpreted as representing the official views or policies of the U.S. Government or the American Epilepsy Society.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:IRB of University of California Los Angeles gave ethical approval for this work. IRB of Thomas Jefferson University gave ethical approval for this work.I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).Yes I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesAll data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors.