RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 USING SYSTEM DYNAMICS MODELING TO ASSESS THE IMPACT OF CONNECTICUT’S GOOD SAMARITAN LAWS: A PROTOCOL PAPER
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2022.01.06.22268677
DO 10.1101/2022.01.06.22268677
A1 Ali, Syed Shayan
A1 Sabounchi, Nasim S.
A1 Heimer, Robert
A1 D’Onofrio, Gail
A1 Violette, Colleen
A1 LaWall, Katherine
A1 Heckmann, Rebekah
YR 2022
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2022/01/06/2022.01.06.22268677.abstract
AB Background We applied a participatory system dynamics (SD) modeling approach to evaluate the effectiveness and impact of Connecticut’s Good Samaritan Laws (GSLs) that are designed to promote bystander intervention during an opioid overdose event and reduce opioid overdose-related adverse outcomes. Our SD model can be used to predict whether additional revisions of the statutes might make GSLs more effective. SD modeling is a novel approach for assessing the impact of GSLs; and, in this protocol paper, we describe its applicability to our policy question, as well as expected outcomes of this approach.Methods This project began in February 2021 and is expected to conclude by March 2022. During this time, a total of six group model-building (GMB) sessions will have been held with key stakeholders to elicit feedback that will, in turn, contribute to the development of a more robust SD model. Session participants include bystanders who witness an overdose, law enforcement personnel, first responders, pharmacists, physicians, and other health care professionals who work in at least two major metropolitan areas of Connecticut (New Haven and Hartford). Due to the restrictions imposed by the COVID-19 pandemic, the sessions are being held virtually via Zoom. The information obtained during these sessions will be integrated with a draft SD model that has already been developed by the modeling team as part of a previous CDC-funded project. Model calibration and policy simulations will then be performed to assess the impact of the current GSLs and to make recommendations for future public policy changes.Discussion An SD modeling approach enables capture of complex interrelationships among multiple health outcomes to better assess the drivers of the opioid epidemic in Connecticut. The model’s simulation results are expected not only to align with current real-world data but also to recreate historical trends and infer future trends in a situationally relevant fashion. This will facilitate the work of policy makers who are devising and implementing time-sensitive changes to address opioid overdose-related deaths at the state level. Replicating our approach as described can be applied to make similar improvements in other jurisdictions.CONTRIBUTIONS TO THE LITERATURE- System dynamics (SD) modeling and group model-building (GMB) approaches enable the group to start with a simple concept model and apply the collective knowledge of the group to finish the session with a much more developed model that can produce impressively accurate simulation results.- The model will be used to understand the impact of Connecticut’s Good Samaritan Laws (GSLs), as well as their limitations, and to deduce factors to further improve public health laws to counter opioid overdose-related deaths.- The approach can be applied to other jurisdictions, taking into account local conditions and existing Good Samaritan legislation.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis project was funded under contract to the Connecticut Department of Public Health (DPH) on behalf of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC): Prescription Drug Overdose Prevention for States (CDC Grant Number: 1U17CE002720-02) and was supported by Grant or Cooperative Agreement number 6NU17CE925011-03-02, funded by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Its contents are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official views of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention or the Department of Health and Human Services. The contents presented do not necessarily reflect CT DPH or CDC policy.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:This project is a collaborative work of researchers from Yale University and City University of New York (CUNY). The project was approved by Yale University IRB on 10/6/20 (Yale IRB #2000028908) and CUNY IRB on 12/30/20 (CUNY IRB number: HRPP #2020-0958)I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesAll data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authorsSDSystems dynamic modellingGMBGroup-based model-buildingCLDCausal Loop DiagramsGSLgood Samaritan law