PT  - JOURNAL ARTICLE
AU  - Cordery, Rebecca
AU  - Purba, Amrit K.
AU  - Begum, Lipi
AU  - Mills, Ewurabena
AU  - Mosavie, Mia
AU  - Vieira, Ana
AU  - Jauneikaite, Elita
AU  - Leung, Rhoda CY
AU  - Siggins, Matthew K.
AU  - Ready, Derren
AU  - Hoffman, Peter
AU  - Lamagni, Theresa
AU  - Sriskandan, Shiranee
TI  - Frequency of transmission, asymptomatic shedding, and airborne spread of <em>Streptococcus pyogenes</em> among schoolchildren exposed to scarlet fever: a longitudinal multi-cohort molecular epidemiology contact tracing study
AID  - 10.1101/2021.07.04.21259990
DP  - 2022 Jan 01
TA  - medRxiv
PG  - 2021.07.04.21259990
4099  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2022/01/04/2021.07.04.21259990.short
4100  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2022/01/04/2021.07.04.21259990.full
AB  - Background Despite recommendations regarding prompt treatment of cases and enhanced hygiene measures, scarlet fever outbreaks increased in England between 2014-2018. We aimed to assess the impact of standard interventions on transmission of Streptococcus pyogenes to classroom contacts, households, and classroom environments.Methods We undertook a prospective, contact tracing study in schools with 2 consecutive scarlet fever cases that were reported to local Health Protection teams in London between March 1st and May 31st in 2018 and 2019. We cultured throat swabs from cases, household contacts, and classroom contacts at four time points. We also cultured hand swabs and cough plates from all cases, and from classroom contacts in 2019. Surface swabs from toys and other fomites in classrooms were cultured in 2018, and settle plates from classrooms were collected in 2019. Any sample with S. pyogenes detected was recorded as positive and underwent emm genotyping and genome sequencing to compare with the outbreak strain.Findings Six classes, comprising 12 scarlet fever cases, 17 household contacts, and 278 classroom contacts were recruited from March 1st to May 31st in 2018 and the same period in 2019. Prevalence of the outbreak S. pyogenes strain in throat swabs from asymptomatic classroom contacts was high, increasing from 9.6% (11/115) in week 1, to 26.9% (34/126) in week 2, to 24.1% (26/108) in week 3, then 14.3% (5/35) in week 4. Colonisation with non-outbreak and non-genotyped S. pyogenes strains was 1.7% (2/115); 3.9% (5/126); 5.6% (6/108); and 0/35 in the same weeks. Genome sequencing showed clonality of isolates within each of six classes, confirming recent transmission accounted for high carriage. When transmissibility was tested, children who were asymptomatic carriers of emm4 and emm3.93 had positive cough plates on 1/14 (7.1%) and 7/21 (33.3%) occasions respectively. Only 1/60 surface swabs taken in 3 classrooms yielded the outbreak S. pyogenes strain. In contrast, 2/12 and 6/12 settle plates placed in elevated locations yielded the outbreak S. pyogenes strain in the two classrooms tested.Interpretation S. pyogenes transmission in schools is intense and may occur prior to, or inspite of reported treatment of cases, underlining a need for rapid case management. Despite guideline adherence, heavy shedding of S. pyogenes by small numbers of classroom contacts may perpetuate outbreaks, and airborne transmission has a plausible role in spread. The findings highlight the need for research to improve understanding and assess effectiveness of interventions to reduce S. pyogenes airborne transmission.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Clinical TrialISRCTN13773960Funding StatementThis work was funded by the following research grants awarded to Imperial College London: Action Medical Research (GN2596); UKRI, Medical Research Council (MR/P022669/1); NIHR Health Protection Research Unit in Healthcare-associated Infection and AMR; NIHR Imperial College Biomedical Research Centre (BRC).Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:The study protocol was approved by a Research Ethics Committee (London Chelsea REC reference 18/LO/0025; IRAS 225006). Informed consent was provided by parents or guardians, and assent provided by each child.I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesAll data pertaining to the study is included in the supplementary files and genomics data is available via the European Nucleotide Archive, under the accession number PRJEB43915