RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Prenatal Exposure to Early Life Adversity and Neonatal Brain Volumes at Birth
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2021.12.20.21268125
DO 10.1101/2021.12.20.21268125
A1 Triplett, Regina L.
A1 Lean, Rachel E.
A1 Parikh, Amisha
A1 Miller, J. Philip
A1 Alexopoulos, Dimitrios
A1 Kaplan, Sydney
A1 Meyer, Dominique
A1 Adamson, Chris
A1 Smyser, Tara A.
A1 Rogers, Cynthia E.
A1 Barch, Deanna M.
A1 Warner, Barbara
A1 Luby, Joan L.
A1 Smyser, Christopher D.
YR 2021
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/12/21/2021.12.20.21268125.abstract
AB Importance Exposure to early life adversity alters the structural development of key brain regions underlying neurodevelopmental impairments. The extent that prenatal exposure to life adversity alters structure at birth remains poorly understood.Objective To determine if prenatal exposure to maternal social advantage and psychosocial distress alters global and regional brain volumes and cortical folding in the first weeks of life.Design A prospective, longitudinal study of sociodemographically-diverse mothers recruited in the first trimester of pregnancy and their infants who underwent brain magnetic resonance imaging scan in the first weeks of life.Setting Mothers were recruited from local obstetric clinics from 2017-2020.Participants Of 399 mother-infant dyads prospectively recruited into the parent study, 280 healthy, term-born infants (47% female, mean postmenstrual age at scan 42 weeks) were eligible for inclusion.Exposures Maternal social advantage and psychosocial distress in pregnancy.Main Measures and Outcomes Two measures of latent constructs were created using Confirmatory Factor Analyses spanning Maternal Social Advantage (Income to Needs ratio, Area Deprivation Index, Healthy Eating Index, education level, insurance status) and Psychosocial Stress (Perceived Stress Scale, Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale, Everyday Discrimination Scale, Stress and Adversity Inventory). Neonatal cortical and subcortical gray matter, white matter, cerebellar, hippocampus, and amygdala volumes were generated using semi-automated age-specific segmentation pipelines.Results After covariate adjustment and multiple comparisons correction, greater social disadvantage (i.e., lower Advantage values) was associated with reduced cortical gray matter (p=.03), subcortical gray matter (p=.008), and white matter (p=.004) volumes and cortical folding (p=.001). Psychosocial Stress was not related to neonatal brain metrics. While social disadvantage was associated with smaller absolute volumes of the bilateral hippocampi and amygdalae, after correcting for total brain volume, there were no regional effects.Conclusions and Relevance Prenatal exposure to social disadvantage is associated with global reductions in brain volumes and cortical folding at birth. No regional specificity for the hippocampus or amygdala was detected. Results highlight that the deleterious effects of poverty begin in utero and are evident in the first weeks of life. These findings emphasize that preventative interventions to support fetal brain development should address socioeconomic hardships for expectant parents.Question Does prenatal exposure to maternal social disadvantage and psychosocial distress alter global and relative brain volumes at birth?Findings In this longitudinal, observational study of 280 mother-infant dyads, prenatal exposure to greater maternal social disadvantage, but not psychosocial distress, was associated with reduced white matter, cortical gray matter, and subcortical gray matter volumes and cortical folding at birth after accounting for maternal health and diet. There were no differential effects in the hippocampus or amygdala.Meaning Prenatal exposure to social disadvantage is associated with global reductions in brain volumes and folding in the first weeks of life.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis study was funded by the National Institute of Mental Health (R01 MH113883 to BBW, JLL, CDS; T32 MH100019 to RLT), the March of Dimes Foundation, and the Washington University Intellectual and Developmental Disability Research Center (P50 HD103525).Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:The Washington University Human Research Protection Office gave ethical approval for this work.I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesAll data produced in the present work are contained in the manuscript.