PT  - JOURNAL ARTICLE
AU  - Politis, Maria D.
AU  - Hua, Xinyi
AU  - Ogwara, Chigozie A.
AU  - Davies, Margaret R.
AU  - Adebile, Temitayo M.
AU  - Sherman, Maya P.
AU  - Zhou, Xiaolu
AU  - Chowell, Gerardo
AU  - Spaulding, Anne C.
AU  - Fung, Isaac Chun-Hai
TI  - Spatially refined time-varying reproduction numbers of SARS-CoV-2 in Arkansas and Kentucky and their relationship to population size and public health policy, March – November, 2020
AID  - 10.1101/2021.05.26.21257862
DP  - 2021 Jan 01
TA  - medRxiv
PG  - 2021.05.26.21257862
4099  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/12/17/2021.05.26.21257862.short
4100  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/12/17/2021.05.26.21257862.full
AB  - Purpose To examine the time-varying reproduction number, Rt, for COVID-19 in Arkansas and Kentucky and investigate the impact of policies and preventative measures on the variability in Rt.Methods Arkansas and Kentucky county-level COVID-19 cumulative case count data (March 6-November 7, 2020) were obtained. Rt was estimated using the R package ‘EpiEstim’, by county, region (Delta, non-Delta, Appalachian, non-Appalachian), and policy measures.Results The Rt was initially high, falling below 1 in May or June depending on the region, before stabilizing around 1 in the later months. The median Rt for Arkansas and Kentucky at the end of the study were 1.15 (95% credible interval [CrI], 1.13, 1.18) and 1.10 (95% CrI, 1.08, 1.12), respectively, and remained above 1 for the non-Appalachian region. Rt decreased when facial coverings were mandated, changing by -10.64% (95% CrI, -10.60%, -10.70%) in Arkansas and -5.93% (95% CrI, -4.31%, -7.65%) in Kentucky. The trends in Rt estimates were mostly associated with the implementation and relaxation of social distancing measures.Conclusions Arkansas and Kentucky maintained a median Rt above 1 during the entire study period. Changes in Rt estimates allows quantitative estimates of potential impact of policies such as facemask mandate.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThe authors did not receive any funding support for this study.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:The Georgia Southern University Institutional Review Board made a non-human subjects determination for this project (H20364) under the G8 exemption category.I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesThe dataset used in this manuscript is publicly available at the New York Times GitHub data repository at https://github.com/nytimes/covid-19-data.