RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Identifying weather variables as important clinical predictors of bacterial diarrhea among international travelers to Nepal and Thailand
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2021.12.16.21267958
DO 10.1101/2021.12.16.21267958
A1 Pender, Melissa A.
A1 Smith, Timothy
A1 Brintz, Ben J.
A1 Pandey, Prativa
A1 Shrestha, Sanjaya
A1 Anuras, Sinn
A1 Demons, Samandra
A1 Sornsakrin, Siriporn
A1 Platts-Mills, James A.
A1 Bodhidatta, Ladaporn
A1 Leung, Daniel T.
YR 2021
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/12/17/2021.12.16.21267958.abstract
AB Background Clinicians and travelers often have limited tools to differentiate bacterial from non-bacterial causes of travelers’ diarrhea (TD). Development of a clinical prediction rule assessing the etiology of TD may help identify episodes of bacterial diarrhea and limit inappropriate antibiotic use. We aimed to identify predictors of bacterial diarrhea among clinical, demographic, and weather variables, as well as to develop and cross-validate a parsimonious predictive model.Methods We collected de-identified clinical data from 457 international travelers with acute diarrhea presenting to two healthcare centers in Nepal and Thailand. We used conventional microbiologic and multiplex molecular methods to identify diarrheal etiology from stool samples. We used random forest and logistic regression to determine predictors of bacterial diarrhea.Results We identified 195 cases of bacterial etiology, 63 viral, 125 mixed pathogens, 6 protozoal/parasite, and 68 cases without a detected pathogen. Random forest regression indicated that the strongest predictors of bacterial over viral or non-detected etiologies were average location-specific environmental temperature and RBC on stool microscopy. In 5-fold cross-validation, the parsimonious model with the highest discriminative performance had an AUC of 0.73 using 3 variables with calibration intercept -0.01 (SD 0.31) and slope 0.95 (SD 0.36).Conclusions We identified environmental temperature, a location-specific parameter, as an important predictor of bacterial TD, among traditional patient-specific parameters predictive of etiology. Future work includes further validation and the development of a clinical decision-support tool to inform appropriate use of antibiotics in TD.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis work was supported in part by the NIAID of the NIH under award number R01AI135114 (to D.T.L.), and by the University of Utah Study Design and Biostatistics Center, with funding in part from the National Center for Research Resources and the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences, and National Institutes of Health.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:The institutional review boards of the University of Utah, the Walter Reed Army Institute of Research, CIWEC Hospital, the Nepal Health Research Council (NHRC), and Bumrungrad International Hospital, gave ethical approval for this work.I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesAll data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors.