PT - JOURNAL ARTICLE AU - Bei, Yanxia AU - Vrtis, Kyle B. AU - Borgaro, Janine G. AU - Langhorst, Bradley W. AU - Nichols, Nicole M. TI - The Omicron variant mutation at position 28,311 in the SARS-CoV-2 N gene does not perturb CDC N1 target detection AID - 10.1101/2021.12.16.21267734 DP - 2021 Jan 01 TA - medRxiv PG - 2021.12.16.21267734 4099 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/12/17/2021.12.16.21267734.short 4100 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/12/17/2021.12.16.21267734.full AB - The emergence of new SARS-CoV-2 variants necessitates the reevaluation of current COVID-19 tests to ensure continued accuracy and reliability. The new SARS-CoV-2 variant, Omicron, is heavily mutated, with over 50 mutations within its RNA genome. Any of these mutations could adversely affect the ability of diagnostic assays to detect the virus in patient samples, potentially leading to inconclusive or false negative results. In fact, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has identified over two dozen diagnostic tests that contain a gene target that is expected to have “significantly reduced sensitivity due to a mutation in the SAS-CoV-2 Omicron variant”1. Additionally, one of the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) targets for COVID-19 tests, 2019-nCoV_N1, overlaps an Omicron mutation within the sequence targeted by the fluorescent probe. This target from the CDC has been used in many other EUA assays. Using in vitro transcribed (IVT) N gene RNA representing the wild-type (GenBank/GISAID ID MN908947.3) and Omicron variant (BA.1, GISAID ID EPI_ISL_6752027), we evaluated the performance of two different amplification protocols, both of which include the CDC 2019-nCoV_N1 primer-probe set. Both assays were able to detect the mutant N1 sequence as efficiently as the wild-type sequence. Consequently, these data suggest that diagnostic assays that use the 2019-nCoV-N1 primer-probe set are unlikely to be impacted by currently circulating Omicron lineage viruses.Competing Interest StatementThe authors are employees of, and received funding from, New England Biolabs, the manufacturer of reagents described in the paper. The authors have no other relevant affiliations or financial involvement with any organization or entity with a financial interest in or financial conflict with the subject matter or materials discussed in the manuscript apart from those disclosed.Funding StatementThis study was funded by New England BioLabs.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesI confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesAll data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors