RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Causal and Associational Language in Observational Health Research: A systematic evaluation
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2021.08.25.21262631
DO 10.1101/2021.08.25.21262631
A1 Haber, Noah A.
A1 Wieten, Sarah E.
A1 Rohrer, Julia M.
A1 Arah, Onyebuchi A.
A1 Tennant, Peter W.G.
A1 Stuart, Elizabeth A.
A1 Murray, Eleanor J.
A1 Pilleron, Sophie
A1 Lam, Sze Tung
A1 Riederer, Emily
A1 Howcutt, Sarah Jane
A1 Simmons, Alison E.
A1 Leyrat, Clémence
A1 Schoenegger, Philipp
A1 Booman, Anna
A1 Dufour, Mi-Suk Kang
A1 O’Donoghue, Ashley L.
A1 Baglini, Rebekah
A1 Do, Stefanie
A1 Rosa Takashima, Mari De La
A1 Evans, Thomas Rhys
A1 Rodriguez-Molina, Daloha
A1 Alsalti, Taym M.
A1 Dunleavy, Daniel J.
A1 Meyerowitz-Katz, Gideon
A1 Antonietti, Alberto
A1 Calvache, Jose A.
A1 Kelson, Mark J.
A1 Salvia, Meg G.
A1 Parra, Camila Olarte
A1 Khalatbari-Soltani, Saman
A1 McLinden, Taylor
A1 Chatton, Arthur
A1 Seiler, Jessie
A1 Steriu, Andreea
A1 Alshihayb, Talal S.
A1 Twardowski, Sarah E.
A1 Dabravolskaj, Julia
A1 Au, Eric
A1 Hoopsick, Rachel A.
A1 Suresh, Shashank
A1 Judd, Nicholas
A1 Peña, Sebastián
A1 Axfors, Cathrine
A1 Khan, Palwasha
A1 Aguirre, Ariadne E. Rivera
A1 Odo, Nnaemeka U.
A1 Schmid, Ian
A1 Fox, Matthew P.
YR 2021
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/12/16/2021.08.25.21262631.abstract
AB We estimated the degree to which language used in the high profile medical/public health/epidemiology literature implied causality using language linking exposures to outcomes and action recommendations; examined disconnects between language and recommendations; identified the most common linking phrases; and estimated how strongly linking phrases imply causality.We searched and screened for 1,170 articles from 18 high-profile journals (65 per journal) published from 2010-2019. Based on written framing and systematic guidance, three reviewers rated the degree of causality implied in abstracts and full text for exposure/outcome linking language and action recommendations.Reviewers rated the causal implication of exposure/outcome linking language as None (no causal implication) in 13.8%, Weak 34.2%, Moderate 33.2%, and Strong 18.7% of abstracts. The implied causality of action recommendations was higher than the implied causality of linking sentences for 44.5% or commensurate for 40.3% of articles. The most common linking word in abstracts was “associate” (45.7%). Reviewer’s ratings of linking word roots were highly heterogeneous; over half of reviewers rated “association” as having at least some causal implication.This research undercuts the assumption that avoiding “causal” words leads to clarity of interpretation in medical research.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Clinical Protocols https://osf.io/jtdaz/ Funding StatementNo funding was granted specifically for the support of this study, and no funders had any role in the collection, analysis, and interpretation of data; in the writing of the report; and in the decision to submit the article for publication. The researchers were independent from funders and that all authors, external and internal, had full access to all of the data (including statistical reports and tables) in the study and can take responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis is also required.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:Not human subjects researchI confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesAll data and code are publicly available through our OSF repository: https://osf.io/jtdaz, except for files containing personal identifying information and/or personal API keys. https://osf.io/jtdaz