PT  - JOURNAL ARTICLE
AU  - Haber, Noah A.
AU  - Wieten, Sarah E.
AU  - Rohrer, Julia M.
AU  - Arah, Onyebuchi A.
AU  - Tennant, Peter W.G.
AU  - Stuart, Elizabeth A.
AU  - Murray, Eleanor J.
AU  - Pilleron, Sophie
AU  - Lam, Sze Tung
AU  - Riederer, Emily
AU  - Howcutt, Sarah Jane
AU  - Simmons, Alison E.
AU  - Leyrat, Clémence
AU  - Schoenegger, Philipp
AU  - Booman, Anna
AU  - Dufour, Mi-Suk Kang
AU  - O’Donoghue, Ashley L.
AU  - Baglini, Rebekah
AU  - Do, Stefanie
AU  - Rosa Takashima, Mari De La
AU  - Evans, Thomas Rhys
AU  - Rodriguez-Molina, Daloha
AU  - Alsalti, Taym M.
AU  - Dunleavy, Daniel J.
AU  - Meyerowitz-Katz, Gideon
AU  - Antonietti, Alberto
AU  - Calvache, Jose A.
AU  - Kelson, Mark J.
AU  - Salvia, Meg G.
AU  - Parra, Camila Olarte
AU  - Khalatbari-Soltani, Saman
AU  - McLinden, Taylor
AU  - Chatton, Arthur
AU  - Seiler, Jessie
AU  - Steriu, Andreea
AU  - Alshihayb, Talal S.
AU  - Twardowski, Sarah E.
AU  - Dabravolskaj, Julia
AU  - Au, Eric
AU  - Hoopsick, Rachel A.
AU  - Suresh, Shashank
AU  - Judd, Nicholas
AU  - Peña, Sebastián
AU  - Axfors, Cathrine
AU  - Khan, Palwasha
AU  - Aguirre, Ariadne E. Rivera
AU  - Odo, Nnaemeka U.
AU  - Schmid, Ian
AU  - Fox, Matthew P.
TI  - Causal and Associational Language in Observational Health Research: A systematic evaluation
AID  - 10.1101/2021.08.25.21262631
DP  - 2021 Jan 01
TA  - medRxiv
PG  - 2021.08.25.21262631
4099  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/12/16/2021.08.25.21262631.short
4100  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/12/16/2021.08.25.21262631.full
AB  - We estimated the degree to which language used in the high profile medical/public health/epidemiology literature implied causality using language linking exposures to outcomes and action recommendations; examined disconnects between language and recommendations; identified the most common linking phrases; and estimated how strongly linking phrases imply causality.We searched and screened for 1,170 articles from 18 high-profile journals (65 per journal) published from 2010-2019. Based on written framing and systematic guidance, three reviewers rated the degree of causality implied in abstracts and full text for exposure/outcome linking language and action recommendations.Reviewers rated the causal implication of exposure/outcome linking language as None (no causal implication) in 13.8%, Weak 34.2%, Moderate 33.2%, and Strong 18.7% of abstracts. The implied causality of action recommendations was higher than the implied causality of linking sentences for 44.5% or commensurate for 40.3% of articles. The most common linking word in abstracts was “associate” (45.7%). Reviewer’s ratings of linking word roots were highly heterogeneous; over half of reviewers rated “association” as having at least some causal implication.This research undercuts the assumption that avoiding “causal” words leads to clarity of interpretation in medical research.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Clinical Protocols https://osf.io/jtdaz/ Funding StatementNo funding was granted specifically for the support of this study, and no funders had any role in the collection, analysis, and interpretation of data; in the writing of the report; and in the decision to submit the article for publication. The researchers were independent from funders and that all authors, external and internal, had full access to all of the data (including statistical reports and tables) in the study and can take responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis is also required.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:Not human subjects researchI confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesAll data and code are publicly available through our OSF repository: https://osf.io/jtdaz, except for files containing personal identifying information and/or personal API keys. https://osf.io/jtdaz