PT  - JOURNAL ARTICLE
AU  - Turner, Lesley
AU  - Culliford, David
AU  - Ball, Jane
AU  - Kitson-Reynolds, Ellen
AU  - Griffiths, Peter
TI  - The association between midwifery staffing levels and the experiences of mothers on postnatal wards: cross sectional analysis of routine data
AID  - 10.1101/2021.12.14.21267798
DP  - 2021 Jan 01
TA  - medRxiv
PG  - 2021.12.14.21267798
4099  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/12/16/2021.12.14.21267798.short
4100  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/12/16/2021.12.14.21267798.full
AB  - Background Women have consistently reported lower satisfaction with postnatal care compared with antenatal and labour care. The aim of this research was to examine whether women’s experience of inpatient postnatal care in England is associated with variation in midwifery staffing levels.Methods Analysis of data from the National Maternity Survey in 2018 including 17,611 women from 129 organisations. This was linked to hospital midwifery staffing numbers from the National Health Service (NHS) Workforce Statistics and the number of births from Hospital Episode Statistics. A two-level logistic regression model was created to examine the association of midwifery staffing levels and experiences in post-natal care.Results The median full time equivalent midwives per 100 births was 3.55 (interquartile range 3.26 to 3.78). Higher staffing levels were associated with less likelihood of women reporting delay in discharge (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 0.849, 95% CI 0.753 to 0.959, p=0.008), increased chances of women reporting that staff always helped in a reasonable time aOR1.200 (95% CI 1.052, 1.369, p=0.007) and that they always had the information or explanations they needed aOR 1.150 (95% CI 1.040, 1.271, p=0.006). Women were more likely to report being treated with kindness and understanding with higher staffing, but the difference was small and not statistically significant aOR 1.059 (0.949, 1.181, p=0.306).Conclusions Negative experiences for women on postnatal wards were more likely to occur in trusts with fewer midwives. Low staffing could be contributing to discharge delays and lack of support and information, which may in turn have implications for longer term outcomes for maternal and infant wellbeing.Explanation While we recognise that not all gestational parents identify as women; this term was chosen as it has been used in the data source which was accessed for this study and represents most people having maternities.Statement of significance (problem) Women report negative experiences of postnatal care compared with antenatal care and birth. There is a recognised shortage of midwives in maternity services, and this may be impacting on the quality of postnatal care.What is already known?There is evidence that midwifery staffing levels are associated with birth outcomes but little empirical evidence on the impact of midwifery staffing levels in postnatal careWhat this paper adds?This analysis of survey data supports previous findings that increased midwifery staffing is associated with benefits. This is the first study to examine the effects of staffing on women’s experience of postnatal care.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementPeter Griffiths receives support from a Senior Investigator award made by the National Institute for Health Research and the National Institute for Health Research Applied Research Centre (Wessex). This research was part funded by the National Institute for Health Researchs Health Services & Delivery Research programme (Award ID : NIHR128056) The views expressed are those of the author(s) and not necessarily those of the National Institute for Health Research, the Department of Health and Social Care, arms-length bodies or other government departments.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:This study involves only openly available data which can be obtained from the UK Dataservice upon requestI confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesData obtained from the UK Data Service/UK Data Archive, including subsets and derived data, cannot be submitted to journals alongside publications as this would be a breach of the End User Licence (EUL) as in https://www.ukdataservice.ac.uk/help/faq/publication.aspx#Journals https://www.ukdataservice.ac.uk/