RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Interdependencies between cellular and humoral immune responses in heterologous and homologous SARS-CoV-2 vaccination
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2021.12.13.21267729
DO 10.1101/2021.12.13.21267729
A1 Hollstein, Moritz M.
A1 Münsterkötter, Lennart
A1 Schön, Michael P.
A1 Bergmann, Armin
A1 Husar, Thea M.
A1 Abratis, Anna
A1 Eidizadeh, Abass
A1 Schaffrinski, Meike
A1 Zachmann, Karolin
A1 Schmitz, Anne
A1 Holsapple, Jason Scott
A1 Stanisz-Bogeski, Hedwig
A1 Schanz, Julie
A1 Groß, Uwe
A1 Leha, Andreas
A1 Zautner, Andreas E.
A1 Schnelle, Moritz
A1 Erpenbeck, Luise
YR 2021
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/12/14/2021.12.13.21267729.abstract
AB Background Homologous and heterologous SARS-CoV-2-vaccinations yield different spike protein-directed humoral and cellular immune responses. However, their interdependencies remain elusive.Methods COV-ADAPT is a prospective, observational cohort study of 417 healthcare workers who received homologous vaccination with Astra (ChAdOx1-S; AstraZeneca) or BNT (BNT162b2; Biontech/Pfizer) or heterologous vaccination with Astra/BNT. We assessed the humoral (anti-spike-RBD-IgG, neutralizing antibodies, antibody avidity) and cellular (spike-induced T cell interferon-γ release) immune response in blood samples up to 2 weeks before (T1) and 2 to 12 weeks following secondary immunization (T2).Findings Initial vaccination with Astra resulted in lower anti-spike-RBD-IgG responses compared to BNT (70±114 vs. 226±279 BAU/ml, p<0.01) at T1, whereas T cell activation did not differ significantly. Booster vaccination with BNT proved superior to Astra at T2 (anti-spike-RBD-IgG: Astra/BNT 2387±1627 and BNT/BNT 3202±2184 vs. Astra/Astra 413±461 BAU/ml, both p<0.001; spike-induced T cell interferon-γ release: Astra/BNT 5069±6733 and BNT/BNT 4880±7570 vs. Astra/Astra 1152±2243 mIU/ml, both p<0.001). No significant differences were detected between BNT-boostered groups at T2. For Astra, we observed no booster effect on T cell activation. We found associations between anti-spike-RBD-IgG levels (Astra/BNT and BNT/BNT) and T cell responses (Astra/Astra and Astra/BNT) from T1 to T2. There were also links between levels of anti-spike-RBD-IgG and T cell at both time points (all groups combined). All regimes yielded neutralizing antibodies and increased antibody avidity at T2.Interpretation Interdependencies between humoral and cellular immune responses differ between common SARS-CoV-2 vaccination regimes. T cell activation is unlikely to compensate for poor humoral responses.Funding Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG), ER723/3-1Evidence before this study We searched Pubmed for papers published between 01/01/2019 and 14/05/2021 with the search terms “covid-19” combined with “vaccination” and “heterologous”, excluding “BCG”. Of the 41 papers found, none addressed the combination of ChAdOx1-S by AstraZeneca (Astra) and BNT162b2 by Biontech/Pfizer (BNT). After our study was initiated, the CombiVacS trial reported a significant booster effect when BNT was given after initial vaccination with Astra.1 The investigators of the CoCo trial subsequently published data on heterologous immunization in comparison to homologous Astra in a small population (n=87), with the heterologous immunization scheme showing a superior humoral and cellular immune response.2 Further studies investigated heterologous vaccinations with Astra and BNT as well as homologous Astra and BNT regimes and also found superior humoral and cellular immune responses in the heterologous regimes compared to homologous Astra, and comparable or slightly superior immune responses when compared to homologous BNT vaccination.3–6 The body of research covering the effects of heterologous immunization regimes has recently been aggregated in a systematic review.7Added value of this study To our knowledge, this is the first study that evaluates the interdependencies of cellular and humoral immune responses following heterologous vaccination with Astra/BNT in a large group of individuals. Our data show strong correlations between humoral and cellular immune responses with the prime-boost combination Astra/BNT. The findings suggest that individuals with a robust initial response developed strong humoral and cellular immune responses after booster immunization.Implications of all the available evidence Our study and the available data suggest that due to its superior capacity to elicit a humoral and cellular immune response, mRNA-based vaccines such as BNT should be chosen for booster vaccination rather than Astra. This seems to be particularly important in individuals whose immune response was poor after initial vaccination with Astra.We demonstrate here an association between humoral and cellular immune responses following vaccination. Our findings suggest that distinct differences between common COVID-19 vaccination regimes should be taken into account in population-based vaccine programs. The present data indicate that a poor humoral immune response is unlikely to be mitigated by a strong cellular immune response.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementLuise Erpenbeck received funding from the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG), ER 723/3-1Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:Ethics committee of the University Medical Center Goettingen gave ethical approval for this work (21/5/21)I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesData and materials of this study are available from the authors on request.