PT - JOURNAL ARTICLE AU - Lakkireddy, Sai Priya AU - Balachander, Srinivas AU - Dayal, Pavithra AU - Bhattacharya, Mahashweta AU - Joseph, Mino Susan AU - Kumar, Pramod AU - Kannampuzha, Anand Jose AU - Mallappagari, Sreenivasulu AU - Shruthi, Suvarna AU - Chandy, Alen Alexander AU - Kumaran, Muthu AU - Sheth, Sweta AU - Ramesh, Vinutha AU - Puzhakkal, Joan C AU - Selvaraj, S Sowmya AU - Ithal, Dhruva AU - Sreeraj, Vanteemar S AU - Mahadevan, Jayant AU - Holla, Bharath AU - Venkatasubramanian, Ganesan AU - John, John P. AU - Murthy, Pratima AU - Benegal, Vivek AU - Janardhan Reddy, YC AU - Jain, Sanjeev AU - ADBS Consortium AU - Viswanath, Biju TI - Neurocognition and its association with adverse childhood experiences and familial risk of mental illness AID - 10.1101/2021.11.28.21266887 DP - 2021 Jan 01 TA - medRxiv PG - 2021.11.28.21266887 4099 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/11/29/2021.11.28.21266887.short 4100 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/11/29/2021.11.28.21266887.full AB - Background Neurocognitive deficits are considered an endophenotype for several psychiatric disorders, typically studied in unaffected first-degree relatives (FDRs). Environmental factors such as adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) may also affect neurocognition. This study examines the effect of ACEs on neurocognitive performance in FDRs of patients with severe mental illness in order to determine whether familial risk has a moderating effect on the relationship between ACEs and neurocognition.Methods The sample consists of a total of 512 individuals composed of unaffected FDRs from multiplex families with severe mental illnesses (schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, obsessive-compulsive disorder or alcohol use disorder) and healthy controls (with no familial risk). Neurocognitive tests included processing speed (Color Trails), new learning (Auditory Verbal Learning Test), working memory (N-Back), and Theory of Mind (SOCRATIS). ACEs were measured using the WHO ACE-International Questionnaire (ACE-IQ). Regression models adjusted for age, gender and education were done to predict each neurocognitive domain by the effect of familial risk, ACE-IQ Total Score and the interaction (familial risk x ACE-IQ Total score).Results When all FDRs were examined as a group, the main effect of familial risk predicted poor performance in all domains of neurocognition (p <0.01), and the ACEs x familial risk interaction had a significant negative association with global neurocognition, processing speed & working memory. This interaction effect was driven predominantly by the familial risk of AUD. In FDRs of schizophrenia & bipolar disorder, only the main effects of familial risk were significant (working memory, theory of mind & global neurocognition), with no impact of ACEs or its interaction in both these sub-groups.Conclusions The impact of childhood adversity on neurocognition is moderated by familial risk of psychiatric disorders. Genetic or familial vulnerability may play a greater role in disorders such as schizophrenia and bipolar disorder, while the interaction between ACEs and family history may be more relevant in the case of disorders with greater environmental risk, such as substance use.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Clinical Protocols https://bmcpsychiatry.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12888-018-1674-2 Funding StatementThis research is funded by the Accelerator program for Discovery in Brain disorders using Stem cells (ADBS) (jointly funded by the Department of Biotechnology, Government of India, and the Pratiksha trust; Grant BT/PR17316/MED/31/326/2015). BV is funded by the Intermediate (Clinical and Public Health) Fellowship (IA/CPHI/20/1/505266) of the DBT/Wellcome Trust India Alliance.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:The ethical approval for this work was given by the Institute Ethics Committee, National Institute of Mental Health and Neuro Sciences (NIMHANS), Bangalore, Karnataka, IndiaI confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesRequests for the data related to this study may be addressed to the corresponding author(s).