RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 A fourth dose of the mRNA-1273 SARS-CoV-2 vaccine improves serum neutralization against the delta variant in kidney transplant recipients
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2021.11.25.21266704
DO 10.1101/2021.11.25.21266704
A1 Benotmane, Ilies
A1 Bruel, Timothée
A1 Planas, Delphine
A1 Fafi-Kremer, Samira
A1 Schwartz, Olivier
A1 Caillard, Sophie
YR 2021
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/11/28/2021.11.25.21266704.abstract
AB In immunocompetent subjects, the effectiveness of SARS-CoV-2 vaccines against the delta variant appears three- to five-fold lower than that observed against the alpha variant. Additionally, three doses of SARS-CoV-2 mRNA-based vaccines might be unable to elicit a sufficient immune response against any variant in immunocompromised kidney transplant recipients. This study describes the kinetics of the neutralizing antibody (NAbs) response against the delta strain before and after a fourth dose of a mRNA vaccine in 67 kidney transplant recipients who had experienced a weak antibody response after three doses. While only 16% of patients harbored NAbs against the delta strain prior to the fourth injection – this percentage raised to 66% afterwards. We also found that, after the fourth dose, the NAbs titer increased significantly (p=0.0001) from <7.5 (IQR : <7.5−15.1) to 47.1 (IQR <7.5−284.2). Collectively, our data indicate that a fourth dose of the mRNA-1273 vaccine in kidney transplant recipients with a weak antibody response after three previous doses improves serum neutralization against the delta variant.Competing Interest StatementDr Caillard reported receiving travel grants from Astellas, Novartis, and Sanofi and receiving lecture honoraria from Bristol Myers Squibb. Dr Benotmane reported receiving travel grants from Novartis, Sandoz, Fresenius Medical Care, and Chiesi. No other disclosures were reported.Funding StatementThis study did not receive any fundingAuthor DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:The study protocol was approved by the local Ethics Committee (comité de protection des personnes de Strasbourg, France, identifier: DC 2013 1990) and written informed consent was obtained from participants.I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesAll data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors