RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Sales of over-the-counter products containing codeine in 31 countries, 2013-2019: a retrospective observational study
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2021.04.21.21255888
DO 10.1101/2021.04.21.21255888
A1 Richards, Georgia C
A1 Aronson, Jeffrey K
A1 MacKenna, Brian
A1 Goldacre, Ben
A1 Hobbs, FD Richard
A1 Heneghan, Carl
YR 2021
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/11/27/2021.04.21.21255888.abstract
AB Introduction Opioid prescribing trends have been investigated in many countries. However, the patterns of over-the-counter purchases of opioids without a prescription, such as codeine combinations, are mostly unknown.Objective We aimed to assess national sales and expenditure trends of over-the-counter codeine-containing products purchased in countries with available data over six years.Methods We conducted a retrospective observational study using electronic point-of-sale data from the human data science company, IQVIA, for countries that had such data, including Argentina, Belgium, Brazil, Bulgaria, Canada, Croatia, Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Ireland, Italy, Japan, Latvia, Lithuania, Mexico, The Netherlands, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Russia, Serbia, Slovakia, Slovenia, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, Thailand, the UK, and the USA. We calculated annual mean sales (dosage units per 1000 of the population) and public expenditure (GBP, £ per 1000 population) for each country between April 2013 and March 2019 and adjusted for data coverage reported by IQVIA. We quantified changes over time and the types of products sold.Results 31.5 billion dosage units (adjusted: 42.8 billion dosage units) of codeine, costing £2.55 billion (adjusted: £3.68 billion), were sold over-the-counter in 31 countries between April 2013 and March 2019. Total adjusted sales increased by 11% (3911 dosage units/1000 population in 2013 to 4358 in 2019) and adjusted public expenditure increased by 72% (£263/1000 in 2013 to £451/1000 in 2019). Sales were not equally distributed; South Africa sold the most (36 mean dosage units/person), followed by Ireland (30 mean dosage units/person), France (20 mean dosage units/person), the UK (17.2 mean dosage units/person), and Latvia (16.8 mean dosage units/person). Types of products (n=569) and formulations (n=12) sold varied.Conclusion In many parts of the world, substantial numbers of people may be purchasing and consuming codeine from over-the-counter products. Clinicians should ask patients about their use of over-the-counter products, and public health measures are required to improve the collection of sales data and the safety of such products.Study protocol pre-registration https://osf.io/ay4mcThe pre-print version of this work is available on medRxiv:https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.04.21.21255888Key pointsCodeine is one of the most accessible pain medicines available worldwide, yet data on its use as an over-the-counter drug has been limited.We found that total sales and expenditure of over-the-counter products containing codeine increased from April 2013 to March 2019, but there was substantial variation in mean sales between countries and the coverage of data reported by IQVIA, with South Africa, France, Japan, the UK, and Poland accounting for 90% of all sales data.In countries with access to over-the-counter codeine products, sales data should be collected, made available, and reviewed to inform regulatory decisions and public health measures to ensure safety.Competing Interest StatementGCR was financially supported by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) School for Primary Care Research (SPCR), the Naji Foundation, and the Rotary Foundation to study for a Doctor of Philosophy (2017-2020), but no longer has any financial COIs. GCR is an Associate Editor of BMJ Evidence Based Medicine. JKA has published articles and edited textbooks on adverse drug reactions and interactions and has often given medicolegal advice, including appearances as an expert witness in coroners' courts, often dealing with the adverse effects of opioids. BM works for NHS England as a pharmacist adviser. BG has received research funding from the Laura and John Arnold Foundation, the NIHR, the NIHR SPCR, the NIHR Oxford Biomedical Research Centre, the Mohn-Westlake Foundation, NIHR Applied Research Collaboration Oxford and Thames Valley, the Wellcome Trust, the Good Thinking Foundation, Health Data Research UK (HDR UK), the Health Foundation, and the World Health Organisation (WHO); he also receives personal income from speaking and writing for lay audiences on the misuse of science. FDRH acknowledges part support from the NIHR SPCR, the NIHR Applied Research Collaboration (ARC) Oxford Thames Valley, and the NIHR Oxford OUH BRC. CH is an NIHR Senior Investigator and has received expenses and fees for his media work, expenses from the WHO, FDA, and holds grant funding from the NIHR SPCR and the NIHR SPCR Evidence Synthesis Working Group [Project 380], the NIHR BRC Oxford and the WHO. On occasion, CH receives expenses for teaching EBM and is also paid for his GP work in NHS out of hours (contract with Oxford Health NHS Foundation Trust). CH is the Director of the CEBM. The views expressed are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the NHS, the NIHR or the Department of Health and Social Care.Clinical Trialhttps://osf.io/ay4mcClinical Protocols https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/AY4MC Funding StatementThe Primary Care Research Trust of Birmingham and Midlands Research Practices Consortium provided the funds to purchase the sales data from IQVIA. The sponsor was not involved in the study design, collection, analysis or interpretation of data, writing of the manuscript, or decisions on submitting the manuscript for publication. The researchers had full access to all the data used in this study, which was independent from the funders. The authors take responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:Not appliciableI confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesStudy materials, protocol, and statistical code are openly available on our OSF repository [64] (https://osf.io/yt6bf/) and at GitHub [61] (https://github.com/georgiarichards/otc_codeine). We cannot openly share the data owing to contractual agreements with IQVIA, but the data can be accessed directly from IQVIA, which will require a fee. https://osf.io/yt6bf/ https://github.com/georgiarichards/otc_codeine