PT  - JOURNAL ARTICLE
AU  - Würtz, Anne Mette
AU  - Kinnerup, Martin B.
AU  - Pugdahl, Kirsten
AU  - Schlünssen, Vivi
AU  - Vestergaard, Jesper Medom
AU  - Nielsen, Kent
AU  - Cramer, Christine
AU  - Bonde, Jens Peter
AU  - Biering, Karin
AU  - Carstensen, Ole
AU  - Hansen, Karoline Kærgaard
AU  - Dalbøge, Annett
AU  - Flachs, Esben Meulengracht
AU  - Hansen, Mette Lausten
AU  - Thulstrup, Ane Marie
AU  - Würtz, Else Toft
AU  - Kjærsgaard, Mona
AU  - Christensen, Mette Wulf
AU  - Kolstad, Henrik Albert
TI  - Healthcare workers’ SARS-CoV-2 infection rates during the second wave of the pandemic: prospective cohort study
AID  - 10.1101/2021.11.17.21266459
DP  - 2021 Jan 01
TA  - medRxiv
PG  - 2021.11.17.21266459
4099  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/11/21/2021.11.17.21266459.short
4100  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/11/21/2021.11.17.21266459.full
AB  - Objectives To assess if healthcare workers during the second wave of the COVID-19 pandemic had increased SARS-CoV-2 infection rates following close contact with patients, co-workers and persons outside work with COVID-19.Design Prospective cohort study.Setting Public hospital employees in Denmark.Participants 5985 healthcare workers (88.6% women) who daily on a smartphone reported COVID-19 contact.Main outcome measures SARS-CoV-2 infection rates defined by the first positive polymerase chain reaction (PCR) test recorded in a register with complete test coverage.Results 159 positive and 35 996 negative PCR tests for SARS-CoV-2 were recorded during 514 165 person-days of follow-up November 25, 2020 - April 30, 2021. The SARS-CoV-2 infection rate for healthcare workers who during the previous 3-7 days had close contact with COVID-19 patients was 153.7 per 100 000 person-days (0.15% per day) corresponding with an incidence rate ratio of 3.17 (40 cases, 95% CI 2.15 to 4.66) when compared with no close contact with COVID-19 patients. SARS-CoV-2 incidence rate ratios following close contact with co-workers and persons outside work with COVID-19 were 2.54 (10 cases, 95% CI 1.30 to 4.96) and 17.79 (35 cases, 95% CI 12.05 to 26.28). These estimates were mutually adjusted and further adjusted for age, sex, month and number of previous PCR tests.Conclusions Despite strong focus on preventive actions during the second wave of the pandemic, healthcare workers were still at increased risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection when in close contact with patients with COVID-19. The numbers affected were comparable to the numbers affected following COVID-19 contact outside work.Close contact with co-workers was also a risk factor. This stresses the need for increased focus on preventive actions to secure healthcare workers’ health during ongoing and future waves of SARS-CoV-2 and other infections.What is already known on this topic?During the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic, preventive measures were inadequate and healthcare workers were at increased risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection.What this study adds?During the second wave of the pandemic, despite a strong focus on preventive actions, healthcare workers were still at increased risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection following close contact with COVID-19 patients.The numbers affected were comparable to the numbers affected following COVID-19 contact outside work.Healthcare works were also at increased risk following close contact with co-workers.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis research has received funding from Central Denmark Region (grant number RR 20200527) and Danish Working Environment Fund (grant number 20205100734). The sponsors had no role in the design and conduct of the study; collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of the data; preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript; or decision to submit the manuscript for publication.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:The Central Denmark Regional Scientific Ethical Committee approved that ethical approval was not required (Jnr 1-10-72-1-20).I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesNo additional data available. For legal and ethical reasons, individual level patient data cannot be shared by the authors and are only accessible to authorised researchers after application to the Danish Health Data Authority.