PT  - JOURNAL ARTICLE
AU  - Chaufan, Claudia
AU  - Dutescu, Ilinca A.
AU  - Fekre, Hanah
AU  - Marzabadi, Saba
AU  - Noh, K.J.
TI  - The military as a neglected pathogen transmitter, from the 19th century to COVID-19: A systematic review
AID  - 10.1101/2021.10.09.21264758
DP  - 2021 Jan 01
TA  - medRxiv
PG  - 2021.10.09.21264758
4099  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/11/17/2021.10.09.21264758.short
4100  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/11/17/2021.10.09.21264758.full
AB  - Background The risk of outbreaks escalating into pandemics has soared with globalization. Therefore, understanding transmission mechanisms of infectious diseases has become critical to formulating global public health policy. This systematic review assessed evidence in the medical and public health literature for the military as a disease vector.Methods We searched 3 electronic databases without temporal restrictions. Two researchers independently extracted study data using a standardized form. Through team discussions, studies were grouped according to their type of transmission mechanism and direct quotes were extracted to generate themes and sub-themes. A content analysis was later performed and frequency distributions for each theme were generated.Results Of 6477 studies, 210 met our inclusion criteria and provided evidence, spanning over two centuries (1810 – 2020), for the military as a pathogen transmitter, within itself or between it and civilians. Biological mechanisms driving transmission included person-to-person transmission, contaminated food and water, vector-borne, and airborne routes. Contaminated food and/or water were the most common biological transmission route. Social mechanisms facilitating transmission included crowded living spaces, unhygienic conditions, strenuous working, training conditions, absent or inadequate vaccination programs, pressure from military leadership, poor compliance with public health advice, contractor mismanagement, high-risk behaviours, and occupation-specific freedom of movement. Living conditions were the most common social transmission mechanism, with young, low ranking military personnel repeatedly reported as the most affected group. Selected social mechanisms, such as employment-related freedom of movement, were unique to the military as a social institution. While few studies explicitly studied civilian populations, considerably more contained information that implied that civilians were likely impacted by outbreaks described in the military.Conclusions This study identified features of the military that pose a significant threat to global health, especially to civilian health in countries with substantial military presence or underdeveloped health systems. While biological transmission mechanisms are shared by other social groups, selected social transmission mechanisms are unique to the military. As an increasingly interconnected world faces the challenges of COVID-19 and future infectious diseases, the identified features of the military may exacerbate current and similar challenges and impair attempts to implement successful and equitable global public health policies.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis research was partially funded by grant #439784 from the Canadian Institute for Health Research (CIHI): Canadian 2019 Novel Coronavirus (COVID-19) Rapid Research Funding Opportunity (2020-02-18).Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesI confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesAll data generated or analysed during this study are available within the article and its supplementary information files.COVID-19Coronavirus disease 2019MeSHMedical Subject HeadingsMERS-CoVMiddle East respiratory syndrome coronavirusPRISMAPreferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-AnalysesPROSPEROInternational Prospective Register of Systematic ReviewSARS-CoVSevere acute respiratory coronavirusSARS-CoV2Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2STDSexually transmitted diseaseUSAUnited States of America