RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Seasonal variation in blood pressure recorded in routine primary care
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2021.11.15.21266359
DO 10.1101/2021.11.15.21266359
A1 Shahsanai, Armindokht
A1 Kalia, Sumeet
A1 Aliarzadeh, Babak
A1 Moineddin, Rahim
A1 Bhatt, Aashka
A1 Greiver, Michelle
YR 2021
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/11/16/2021.11.15.21266359.abstract
AB Objective Seasonal variations in blood pressure (BP) exist. There is limited information about important clinical factors associated with increased BP and the strength and amplitude of seasonal variation in primary care.Methods This was a repeated cross-sectional observational study of routinely measured BPs in primary care using data from electronic medical records in the greater Toronto region, from January 2009 to June 2019. We used time-series models and mean monthly systolic BPs (SBPs) and diastolic BPs (DBPs) to estimate the strength and amplitude of seasonal oscillations, as well as their associations with patient characteristics.Results 314,518 patients were included. Mean SBPs and DBPs were higher in winter than summer. There was strong or perfect seasonality for all characteristics studied, except for BMI less than 18.5 (underweight). Overall, the mean maximal amplitude of the oscillation was 1.51mmHg for SPB (95% CI 1.30mmHg to 1.72mmHg) and 0.59mmHg for DBP (95% CI 0.44mmHg to 0.74mmHg). Patients aged 81 years or older had larger SBP oscillations than younger patients aged 18 to 30 years; the difference was 1.20mmHg (95% CI 1.15mmHg to 1.66mmHg). Hypertension was also associated with greater oscillations, difference 0.53mmHg (95% CI 0.18mmHg to 0.88mmHg). There were no significant differences in SBP oscillations by other patient characteristics, and none for DBP.Conclusion Strong seasonality was detected for almost all patient subgroups studied and was greatest for older patients and for those with hypertension. The variation in BP between summer and winter should be considered by clinicians when making BP treatment decisions.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementNone detectedAuthor DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:The study was reviewed and approved by the University of Toronto's Research Ethics Board.I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesThis work was supported by UTOPIAN, which is part of the Research and Advocacy Program at the Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto. The EMR database is not publicly available and requires appropriate credentials to access.