PT - JOURNAL ARTICLE AU - Wels, Jacques AU - Booth, Charlotte AU - Wielgoszewska, Bożena AU - Green, Michael J. AU - Gessa, Giorgio Di AU - Huggins, Charlotte F. AU - Griffith, Gareth J. AU - Kwong, Alex S. F. AU - Bowyer, Ruth C. E. AU - Maddock, Jane AU - Patalay, Praveetha AU - Silverwood, Richard J. AU - Fitzsimons, Emla AU - Shaw, Richard J. AU - Thompson, Ellen AU - Steptoe, Andrew AU - Hughes, Alun AU - Chaturvedi, Nishi AU - Steves, Claire J. AU - Katikireddi, Srinivasa Vittal AU - Ploubidis, George B. TI - Association of COVID-19 employment disruption with mental and social wellbeing: evidence from nine UK longitudinal studies AID - 10.1101/2021.11.15.21266264 DP - 2021 Jan 01 TA - medRxiv PG - 2021.11.15.21266264 4099 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/11/16/2021.11.15.21266264.short 4100 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/11/16/2021.11.15.21266264.full AB - Background The COVID-19 pandemic has led to major economic disruptions. In March 2020, the UK implemented the Coronavirus Job Retention Scheme – known as furlough – to minimize the impact of job losses. We investigate associations between change in employment status and mental and social wellbeing during the early stages of the pandemic.Methods Data from 25,670 respondents, aged 16 to 66, from nine UK longitudinal studies were analysed. Changes in employment (including being furloughed) were defined by comparing employment status pre-pandemic and during the first lockdown. Mental and social wellbeing outcomes included psychological distress, life satisfaction, self-rated health, social contact, and loneliness. Study-specific modified Poisson regression estimates, adjusting for socio-demographic characteristics and pre-pandemic outcome measures, were pooled using meta-analysis.Results Compared to those who remained working, furloughed workers were at greater risk of psychological distress (adjusted risk ratio, ARR=1.12; 95% CI: 0.97, 1.29), low life satisfaction (ARR=1.14; 95% CI: 1.07, 1.22), loneliness (ARR=1.12; 95% CI: 1.01, 1.23), and fair/poor self-rated health (ARR=1.26; 95% CI: 1.05, 1.50), but risk ratios appear less pronounced compared to those no longer employed (e.g., psychological distress, ARR=1.39; 95% CI: 1.21, 1.59) or stable unemployed (e.g., psychological distress, ARR=1.33; 95% CI: 1.09, 1.62).Conclusions During the early stages of the pandemic those furloughed had increased risk for poor mental and social wellbeing. However, their excess risk was lower in magnitude than those who became or remained unemployed, suggesting that furlough partly mitigated poorer outcomes.Competing Interest StatementNo conflicts of interest were declared by the authors, except Srinivasa Vittal Katikireddi who is a member of the Scientific Advisory Group on Emergencies.Funding StatementThis work was supported by the National Core Studies, an initiative funded by UKRI, NIHR and the Health and Safety Executive. The COVID-19 Longitudinal Health and Wellbeing National Core Study was funded by the Medical Research Council (MC_PC_20030).Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:All datasets included in this analysis have established data sharing processes, and for most included studies the anonymised datasets with corresponding documentation can be downloaded for use by researchers from the UK Data Service. We have detailed the processes for each dataset in Supplementary File 1.I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesAll datasets included in this analysis have established data sharing processes, and for most included studies the anonymised datasets with corresponding documentation can be downloaded for use by researchers from the UK Data Service. All datasets included in this analysis have established data sharing processes, and for most included studies the anonymised datasets with corresponding documentation can be downloaded for use by researchers from the UK Data Service. We have detailed the processes for each dataset in Supplementary File 1. https://ukdataservice.ac.uk/ ARRAdjusted Risk RatioALSPAC-G1Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children.ALSPAC-G0Parents of ALSPAC-G1.BCS701970 British Cohort Study.CIConfidence intervalCJRSCoronavirus Job Retention Scheme.ELSAEnglish Longitudinal Study of Ageing.GSGeneration Scotland: the Scottish Family Health Study.MCSMillennium Cohort Study.NCDS1958 National Child Development Study.NSNext Steps (formerly the Longitudinal Study of Young People in England).UKUnited KingdomUSOCUnderstanding Society.