RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Environmental and behavioral exposure pathways associated with diarrhea and enteric pathogen detection in twenty-six week old urban Kenyan infants: a cross-sectional study
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2021.11.13.21266307
DO 10.1101/2021.11.13.21266307
A1 Baker, Kelly K.
A1 Mumma, Jane
A1 Simiyu, Sheillah
A1 Sewell, Daniel
A1 Tsai, Kevin
A1 Anderson, John
A1 MacDougall, Amy
A1 Dreibelbis, Robert
A1 Cumming, Oliver
YR 2021
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/11/14/2021.11.13.21266307.abstract
AB The prevalence of enteric pathogen detection in children in low-income countries climbs rapidly between birth and 6 months of age. Few studies have tested whether improved household environmental and behavioral hygiene conditions protects infants from exposure to enteric pathogens spread via unhygienic human and animal sanitation conditions, especially during this early window of infancy. This cross-sectional study utilized enrollment survey data among households with 6 month old infants in Kisumu, Kenya participating in the Safe Start cluster-randomized controlled trial to estimate associations between household water access and treatment, animal vectors, sanitation access, hand washing practices, supplemental feeding, and flooring, with the outcomes of caregiver-reported 7-day diarrhea prevalence and sum count of different enteric viruses, bacteria, and parasites pathogens in infant stool. Then, we tested whether household environmental hygiene and behavioral practices moderated associations between infant exposure outcomes and latrine access and domestic animal co-habitation. We found that reported handwashing after handling animals and before eating were strongly associated with lower risk of caregiver-reported diarrhea, while owning and co-habitating with animals (versus no animals), living in a household with vinyl covered dirt floors (versus finished floors), and feeding infants cow milk (versus no milk) were strongly associated with pathogen detection in infants. Caregiver handwashing after child or self-defecation moderated the relationship between shared sanitation (vs private) sanitation access and infant exposure to pathogens such that handwashing had the greatest benefit for preventing pathogen exposure of infants in households with private latrines. In the absence of handwashing, access to private sanitation posed no benefits over shared latrines for protecting infants from exposure. Our evidence highlights eliminating animal co-habitation, improving flooring, improving post-defecation and food-related handwashing, and improving safety of cow milk sources and/or safe household storage of milk as interventions to prevent enteric pathogen exposure of infants less than 6 months age.What is already known?The population prevalence of enteric infections and diarrhea climbs rapidly in the first year of life. Risk factors for pediatric infections include unhygienic human and animal sanitary conditions that introduce feces into the environment, as well as intermediate environmental and behavioral exposure pathways. Research examining the mitigating role of improved environmental and behavioral conditions in preventing infant exposure to human and animal sanitary conditions is limited.What are the new findings?Contact with domestic animals and feeding infants cow milk are leading risk factors for exposure to enteric pathogens by 6 months age in Kisumu, while handwashing after animal handling and before eating are protective factors against self-reported diarrhea. The benefits of access to a private improved latrine (versus shared) for protecting infants from pathogen exposure were conditional upon caregivers washing hands after defecation or child-defecation.What do the new findings imply?Interventions that keep animals out of infant living spaces and that improve food-related and post-defecation handwashing may be the most effective strategies for controlling the population prevalence of enteric infections in infants between birth and 6 months age in Kisumu and similar settings.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Clinical Protocols https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03468114 Funding StatementThe Safe Start trial, on which the study built, was funded by the United Kingdom Department for International Development (DFID) through the SHARE Research Consortium.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:The study was approved by the scientific and ethical review committees at the Great Lakes University of Kisumu (Ref. No. GREC/010/248/2016), London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine (Ref. No. 14695), and University of Iowa (IRB ID 201804204).I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesAll data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors