PT  - JOURNAL ARTICLE
AU  - Linke, J.O.
AU  - Haller, S.P.
AU  - Xu, E.
AU  - Nguyen, L.
AU  - Chue, A.
AU  - Zapp, C.
AU  - Revzina, O.
AU  - Perlstein, S.
AU  - Ross, A.J.
AU  - Tseng, W.-L.
AU  - Shaw, P.
AU  - Brotman, M.A.
AU  - Pine, D.S.
AU  - Gotts, S.J.
AU  - Leibenluft, E.
AU  - Kircanski, K.
TI  - Persistent frustration-induced reconfigurations of brain networks predict individual differences in irritability
AID  - 10.1101/2021.11.07.21266032
DP  - 2021 Jan 01
TA  - medRxiv
PG  - 2021.11.07.21266032
4099  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/11/11/2021.11.07.21266032.short
4100  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/11/11/2021.11.07.21266032.full
AB  - Background Frustration, the response to blocked goal attainment, is a universal affective experience, but how the brain embodies frustration is not known. Understanding brain network dynamics during frustration may provide insight into pediatric irritability, one of the most frequent reasons for psychiatric consultation in youth and a risk factor for affective disorders and suicidality.Methods Using fMRI, we investigated changes in neural network architecture from a baseline resting-state, through a task that included frustrative nonreward (FNR) and anticipation of new feedback following FNR (FNR+1), to a post-task resting-state in a transdiagnostic sample of 66 youth (33 female, mean age 14 years). Using a train/test/held-out procedure, we aimed to predict past-week irritability from the global efficiency (i.e., Eglob, capacity for parallel information processing) of brain networks before, during, and after frustration.Results Compared to pre-task resting state, FNR+1 and the post-state resting state were uniquely associated with a more segregated brain network organization. Nodes that were originally affiliated with the default-mode-temporal-limbic and fronto-parietal networks contributed most to this reconfiguration. Solely Eglob of brain networks that emerged after the frustrating task predicted self- and observer-rated irritability in previously unseen data. Self-reported irritability was predicted by Eglob of a fronto-temporal-limbic module, while observer-rated irritability was predicted by Eglob of motor-parietal and ventral-prefrontal-subcortical modules.Discussion We characterize frustration as an evolving brain network process and demonstrate the importance of the post-frustration recovery period for the pathophysiology of irritability; an insight that, if replicated, suggests specific intervention targets for irritability.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThe authors research is supported by the National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) Intramural Research Program (ZIAMH002786, ZIAMH002778, ZIAMH002782), conducted under NIH Clinical Study Protocols described at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02531893, NCT00025935, and NCT00018057).Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:The Institutional Review Board of the National Institute of Mental Health gave ethical approval for this work.I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesThe data that support the findings of this study are available on request from the corresponding author (JOL). The data are not publicly available as not all participants consented to the sharing of their data.