PT - JOURNAL ARTICLE AU - Badaly, Daryaneh AU - Beers, Sue R. AU - Ceschin, Rafael AU - Lee, Vincent K. AU - Sulaiman, Shahida AU - Zahner, Alexandria AU - Wallace, Julia AU - Berdaa-Sahel, Aurélia AU - Burns, Cheryl AU - Lo, Cecilia W. AU - Panigrahy, Ashok TI - Cerebellar and Prefrontal Structures Associated with Executive Functioning in Pediatric Patients with Congenital Heart Defects AID - 10.1101/2021.11.09.21266092 DP - 2021 Jan 01 TA - medRxiv PG - 2021.11.09.21266092 4099 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/11/11/2021.11.09.21266092.short 4100 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/11/11/2021.11.09.21266092.full AB - Objective Children, adolescents, and young adults with congenital heart defects (CHD) often display cognitive and behavioral manifestations of executive dysfunction. We consider the prefrontal and cerebellar brain structures as mechanisms for executive dysfunction among those with CHD.Method 55 participants with CHD (M age = 13.93) and 95 healthy controls (M age = 13.13) completed magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the brain, from which we extracted volumetric data on prefrontal and cerebellar regions. Participants also completed neuropsychological tests of executive functioning; their parents completed behavioral ratings of their executive functions.Results Compared to healthy controls, those with CHD had smaller cerebellums and lateral, medial, and orbital prefrontal regions, they performed more poorly on tests of working memory, inhibitory control, and mental flexibility, and their parents rated them as having poorer executive functions across several indices. Across both groups, there were significant correlations for cerebellar and/or prefrontal volumes with cognitive assessments of working memory, mental flexibility, and inhibitory control and with behavioral ratings of working memory, task initiation, and emotional control. Greater prefrontal volumes were associated with better working memory, among those with larger cerebellums (with group differences based on the measure and the prefrontal region). Greater prefrontal volumes were related to better emotional regulation only among participants with CHD with smaller cerebellar volumes, and with poorer inhibition and emotional regulation only among healthy controls with larger cerebellar volumes.Conclusion The cerebellum modulates the relationships between prefrontal regions and executive functioning differently for pediatric patients with CHD versus health controls.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis work was supported by the Department of Defense (W81XWH–16–1–0613), the National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute (R01 HL152740–1, R01 HL128818–05), the National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute with National Institute of Aging (R01 HL128818–05 S1), the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (K23 063371), the National Library of Medicine (5T15LM007059-27), the Pennsylvania Department of Health, the Mario Lemieux Foundation, and the Twenty Five Club Fund of Magee Women’s Hospital.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:The project was approved by University of Pittsburgh Institutional Review Board (IRB) and completed in accordance with the ethical principles of the Helsinki Declaration. IRB: CR19040003-005, STUDY20060128 I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesAll data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors.