RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Forecasting the COVID-19 Pandemic: Lessons learned and future directions
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2021.11.06.21266007
DO 10.1101/2021.11.06.21266007
A1 Sundar, Saketh
A1 Schwab, Patrick
A1 Tan, Jade Z.H.
A1 Romero-Brufau, Santiago
A1 Celi, Leo Anthony
A1 Wangmo, Dechen
A1 Penna, Nicolás Della
YR 2021
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/11/09/2021.11.06.21266007.abstract
AB The Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) has demonstrated that accurate forecasts of infection and mortality rates are essential for informing healthcare resource allocation, designing countermeasures, implementing public health policies, and increasing public awareness. However, there exist a multitude of modeling methodologies, and their relative performances in accurately forecasting pandemic dynamics are not currently comprehensively understood.In this paper, we introduce the non-mechanistic MIT-LCP forecasting model, and assess and compare its performance to various mechanistic and non-mechanistic models that have been proposed for forecasting COVID-19 dynamics. We performed a comprehensive experimental evaluation which covered the time period of November 2020 to April 2021, in order to determine the relative performances of MIT-LCP and seven other forecasting models from the United States’ Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Forecast Hub.Our results show that there exist forecasting scenarios well-suited to both mechanistic and non-mechanistic models, with mechanistic models being particularly performant for forecasts that are further in the future when recent data may not be as informative, and non-mechanistic models being more effective with shorter prediction horizons when recent representative data is available. Improving our understanding of which forecasting approaches are more reliable, and in which forecasting scenarios, can assist effective pandemic preparation and management.Competing Interest StatementPatrick Schwab is an employee and shareholder of GlaxoSmithKline plc. Jade Z.H. Tan is an employee of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS).Funding StatementNo external funding was received.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesI confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesAll scripts used for forecasting and production of data are located at: https://github.com/sakethsundar/covid-forecaster. All data used for analysis was obtained from the CDC forecast hub repository at: https://github.com/reichlab/covid19-forecast-hub/tree/master/data-processed.