RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 HYPER: Group testing via hypergraph factorization applied to COVID-19
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2021.02.24.21252394
DO 10.1101/2021.02.24.21252394
A1 Hong, David
A1 Dey, Rounak
A1 Lin, Xihong
A1 Cleary, Brian
A1 Dobriban, Edgar
YR 2021
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/10/27/2021.02.24.21252394.abstract
AB Large scale screening is a critical tool in the life sciences, but is often limited by reagents, samples, or cost. An important challenge in screening has recently manifested in the ongoing effort to achieve widespread testing for individuals with SARS-CoV-2 infection in the face of substantial resource constraints. Group testing methods utilize constrained testing resources more efficiently by pooling specimens together, potentially allowing larger populations to be screened with fewer tests. A key challenge in group testing is to design an effective pooling strategy. The global nature of the ongoing pandemic calls for something simple (to aid implementation) and flexible (to tailor for settings with differing needs) that remains efficient. Here we propose HYPER, a new group testing method based on hypergraph factorizations. We provide theoretical characterizations under a general statistical model, and exhaustively evaluate HYPER and proposed alternatives for SARS-CoV-2 screening under realistic simulations of epidemic spread and within-host viral kinetics. We demonstrate that HYPER performs at least as well as other methods in scenarios that are well-suited to each method, while outperforming those methods across a broad range of resource-constrained environments, being more flexible and simple in design, and taking no expertise to implement. An online tool to implement these designs in the lab is available at http://hyper.covid19-analysis.org.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementD.H. was supported by the Dean's Fund for Postdoctoral Research of the Wharton School and NSF BIGDATA grant IIS 1837992. R.D. and X.L. were supported by a grant from the Partners in Health. E.D. was supported in part by NSF BIGDATA grant IIS 1837992.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:N/AI confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesSimulated data can be regenerated using the accompanying code.