RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Assessment of knowledge retention of healthcare staff through telephonic interview after training for rotavirus vaccine introduction in India
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2021.10.26.21265523
DO 10.1101/2021.10.26.21265523
A1 Quadri, Syed F
A1 Kaur, Amanjot
A1 Ray, Arindam
A1 Koshal, Seema Singh
A1 Shersiya, Mayank
A1 Haldar, Pradeep
A1 Kapur, Sanjay
A1 Haseeb, Mohammed
A1 Roy, Arup Deb
YR 2021
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/10/26/2021.10.26.21265523.abstract
AB Background Studies have shown that while training has significant potential in improving the knowledge and skills of healthcare staff, the beneficial effect of training may decline with time. Studies have emphasized the role of assessment in understanding the relevance of the training structure and content and employing course correction as per the need. Besides, there is a lack of literature on the assessment of the level of knowledge retention among the participants. This study aims to conduct an assessment study to determine the level of knowledge retention.Methods The study was conducted among frontline health workers who received training on the rotavirus vaccine introduction. Assessments were conducted at a gap of one month and twelve months after the intervention. Simple percentages were used to compare the level of knowledge retention and McNemar’s chi-square test to determine P values.Results This is the first study conducted in India to assess the retention of knowledge 12 months after the new vaccine introduction training of health care professionals. The study comprised 41 participants who demonstrated an increase in the level of knowledge retention at the end of 1-month; however, a decline in the knowledge retention was seen at 12-months. For the issue of missed second dose among children who received the first dose, an increase in knowledge level and retention was observed.Conclusion The study results showed that a time-bound decline in knowledge retention occurs. The authors recommend regular monitoring, refresher training to supplement the primary training.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis study did not receive any fundingAuthor DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:Institutional Review Board of MGM-ECRHS, MGM Medical College, Aurangabad, Maharashtra The committee gave ethical clearance to conduct study.I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesAll data produced in the present work are contained in the manuscript