PT - JOURNAL ARTICLE AU - Matsumoto, Yuki TI - Mapping routine measles vaccination and factors related to uncompleted vaccination in Japan: An ecological study AID - 10.1101/2021.10.23.21265425 DP - 2021 Jan 01 TA - medRxiv PG - 2021.10.23.21265425 4099 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/10/26/2021.10.23.21265425.short 4100 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/10/26/2021.10.23.21265425.full AB - Objective Few studies in Japan have considered regional differences in immunisation coverage and have geographically examined its distribution. We aimed to identify the municipal-level distribution of immunisation coverage and explore regional characteristics associated with its regional differences through ecological studies.Design An ecological study.Setting Japan municipalities.Participants All 1737 municipalities.Outcome measure The mean measles-rubella (MR) vaccination rate distribution from 2013 to 2018 was drawn using GIS. We tested the null hypothesis of non-random distribution using spatial autocorrelation analysis (Global Moran’s I). We presented clusters of municipalities with significantly higher and lower vaccination rates by hot spot analysis (Getis-Ord Gi*). Furthermore, we estimated among municipality characteristics, regional ones associated with vaccination rates.Results According to Global Moran’s I, the MR vaccine coverage distribution was clustered significantly (z = 11.44, p <0.00). Based on the hot spot analysis, the western Japan region tended to have more cold spots with low inoculation rates, small numbers of births and areas with considerable annual variations in vaccination rates. In multiple regression analysis using regional characteristics as independent variables, the 1-year and 6-month check-up rates (Model 2: 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.21-0.36), number of births (0.96-1.54), and standard deviation of the vaccination rate in a target year per municipality (0.17-0.24), were positively associated with the vaccination rate. Contrariwise, average mothers’ age (−1.15 to -0.34), percentage of single-parent households (−0.48 to -0.17), percentage of households with multiple children (−0.12 to -0.04), and moving-in rates (−0.26 to -0.05) were negatively associated with vaccination rate.Conclusion To eliminate regional differences in immunisation coverage, it is practical to identify areas with low immunisation coverage for a proactive corrective approach. The regional characteristics identified in this study, such as population structure, administrative characteristics, and trends in socioeconomic status in municipalities will make it possible to identify target areas.Strengths and limitations of this studyThe mean measles-rubella (MR) vaccination rate distribution from 2013 to 2018 was drawn using GIS.We tested the null hypothesis of non-random distribution using spatial autocorrelation analysis (Global Moran’s I).We presented clusters of municipalities with significantly higher and lower vaccination rates by hot spot analysis (Getis-Ord Gi*).Furthermore, we estimated among municipality characteristics, regional ones associated with vaccination ratesCompeting Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis study did not receive any funding Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesI confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesAll data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors