PT - JOURNAL ARTICLE AU - Boerwinkle, Varina L. AU - Sussman, Bethany AU - Manjón, Iliana AU - Mirea, Lucia AU - Suleman, Saher AU - Wyckoff, Sarah N. AU - Bonnell, Alexandra AU - Orgill, Andrew AU - Tom, Deborah TI - Association of Network Connectivity via Resting State Functional MRI with Consciousness, Mortality, and Outcomes in Neonatal Acute Brain Injury AID - 10.1101/2021.10.18.21265147 DP - 2021 Jan 01 TA - medRxiv PG - 2021.10.18.21265147 4099 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/10/20/2021.10.18.21265147.short 4100 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/10/20/2021.10.18.21265147.full AB - Background An accurate and comprehensive test of integrated brain network function is needed for neonates during the acute brain injury period to inform on morbidity. This retrospective cohort study aimed to assess whether integrated brain network function by resting state functional MRI, acquired during the acute period in neonates with brain injury, is associated with acute exam, neonatal mortality, and 5-month outcomes.Methods This study included 40 consecutive neonates with resting state functional MRI acquired 1-22 days after suspected brain insult from March 2018 to July 2019 at Phoenix Childrens Hospital. Acute period exam and test results were assigned ordinal scores based on severity as documented by respective treating specialists. Analyses (Fisher exact, Wilcoxon-rank sum test, ordinal/multinomial logistic regression) examined association of resting state networks with demographics, presentation, neurological exam, electroencephalogram, anatomical MRI, magnetic resonance spectroscopy, passive task functional MRI, and outcomes of discharge condition, outpatient development, motor tone, seizure, and mortality.Results Subjects had a mean (standard deviation) gestational age of 37.8 (2.6) weeks, a majority were male (63%), with diagnosis of hypoxic ischemic encephalopathy (68%). Other findings at birth included mild distress (48%), moderately abnormal neurological exam (33%), and consciousness characterized as awake but irritable (40%). Significant associations after multiple testing corrections were detected for resting state networks: basal ganglia with outpatient developmental delay (odds ratio [OR], 14.5; 99.4% confidence interval [CI], 2.00-105; P<.001) and motor tone/weakness (OR, 9.98; 99.4% CI, 1.72-57.9; P<.001); language/frontal-parietal network with discharge condition (OR, 5.13; 99.4% CI, 1.22-21.5; P=.002) and outpatient developmental delay (OR, 4.77; 99.4% CI, 1.21-18.7; P=.002); default mode network with discharge condition (OR, 3.72; 99.4% CI, 1.01-13.78; P=.006) and neurological exam (P=.002 (FE); OR, 11.8; 99.4% CI, 0.73-191; P=.01 (OLR)); seizure onset zone with motor tone/weakness (OR, 3.31; 99.4% CI, 1.08-10.1; P=.003). Resting state networks were not detected in only three neonates, who died prior to discharge.Conclusions This study provides level 3 evidence (OCEBM Levels of Evidence Working Group) that the degree of abnormality of resting state networks in neonatal acute brain injury is associated with acute exam and outcomes. Total lack of brain network detection was only found in patients who did not survive.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis study did not receive any fundingAuthor DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:Ethics committee/IRB of Phoenix Childrens Hospital gave eithial approval for this work.I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesAll data produced in the present work are contained in the manuscript or supplementary material.ABIacute brain injuryIBNFintegrated brain network functionDoCdisorders of consciousnessWLSTwithdrawal of life sustaining therapy determinationsEEGelectroencephalogramfMRIfunctional magnetic resonance imagingRSNresting state network(s)DMNdefault mode networkFPfrontal-parietal networkLang-FPlanguage/frontal-parietal networkHIEhypoxic ischemic encephalopathya-MRIanatomical MRIBDbrain deathRSresting state functional magnetic resonance imagingMRSmagnetic resonance spectroscopycv-EEGcontinuous video EEGTRrepetition timeTEecho timeICAindependent component analysisBOLDblood oxygenation level dependent signalDREdrug resistant epilepsyFEFisher exactORodds ratioCIconfidence intervalsOLRordinal logistic regression analysesMLRmultinomial logistic regression modelsCCcorrelation coefficientTBItraumatic brain injury