PT  - JOURNAL ARTICLE
AU  - Spors, Emma
AU  - Michael, Semhar
TI  - Standardized incidence ratio of the COVID-19 pandemic: a case study in a Midwestern state
AID  - 10.1101/2021.09.28.21263671
DP  - 2021 Jan 01
TA  - medRxiv
PG  - 2021.09.28.21263671
4099  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/10/08/2021.09.28.21263671.short
4100  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/10/08/2021.09.28.21263671.full
AB  - Motivation The Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has made a dramatic impact around the world, with some communities facing harsher outcomes than others. We sought to understand how counties in the state of South Dakota (SD) fared compared to expected based on a reference population and what factors contributed to negative outcomes from the pandemic in SD.Methods The Standardized Incidence Ratios (SIR) of all counties, using age-adjusted and crude adjusted hospitalization and death rates were computed using the SD age-adjusted rate as a reference population. In addition, a penalized generalized linear regression model was used to identify factors that are associated with COVID-19 hospitalization and death rates. This model was then used to compute a new SIR after controlling for other socio-demographic and -economic factors.Results We identified counties that had more or less severe outcomes than what would be expected based on the rate of SD after age adjustment. Additionally, race, education, and testing rate were some of the significant factors associated with the outcome. The SIR values after controlling for these additional factors showed change in magnitude from the range of 4 times more severe to 1.5 times more severe out-come than what is expected. Interestingly the lower end of this interval did not have a major change.Conclusion The age adjusted SIR model used in this study allowed for the identification of counties with more or less severe than what is expected based on the state rate. These counties tended to be those with high nonwhite percentage, which mostly included counties with American Indian reservations. Although several predictors are associated with hospitalization and deaths, the penalized model confirmed what is already reported in literature that race and education level have a very high association with the outcome variables. As can be expected the further adjusted SIR mostly changed in those counties with higher than expected outcomes. We believe that these results may provide useful information to improve the implementation of mitigation strategies to curb the damage of this or future pandemics by providing a way for data-driven resource allocation.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis project was funded by the South Dakota STate Universities Presidential Research ProjectAuthor DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:It is the determination of the Institutional Review Board (IRB) of South Dakota State University that the project referenced above does not meet the Federal definition of Human Subjects Research because it will use de-identified data that have already been collected. Thus, the study is not subject to the Common Rule or the purview of the IRB. Dianne Nagy Research Integrity and Compliance OfficerI confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesThe South Dakota Department of Health provided the data per the request of a researcher.