PT - JOURNAL ARTICLE AU - Swanson, Tessa AU - Guikema, Seth AU - Bagian, James AU - Schemanske, Christopher AU - Payne, Claire TI - COVID-19 aerosol transmission simulation-based risk analysis for in-person learning AID - 10.1101/2021.10.04.21263860 DP - 2021 Jan 01 TA - medRxiv PG - 2021.10.04.21263860 4099 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/10/05/2021.10.04.21263860.short 4100 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/10/05/2021.10.04.21263860.full AB - As educational institutions begin a school year following a year and a half of disruption from the COVID-19 pandemic, risk analysis can help to support decision-making for resuming in-person instructional operation by providing estiamtes of the relative risk reduction due to different interventions. In particular, a simulation-based risk analysis approach enables scenario evaluation and comparison to guide decision making and action prioritization under uncertainty. We develop a simulation model to characterize the risks and uncertainties associated with infections resulting from aerosol exposure in in-person classes. We demonstrate this approach by applying it to model a semester of courses in a real college with approximately 11,000 students embedded within a larger university. To have practical impact, risk cannot focus on only infections as the end point of interest, we estimate the risks of infection, hospitalizations, and deaths of students and faculty in the college. We incorporate uncertainties in disease transmission, the impact of policies such as masking and facility interventions, and variables outside of the college’s control such as population-level disease and immunity prevalence. We show in our example application that universal use of masks that block 40% of aerosols and the installation of near-ceiling, fan-mounted UVC systems both have the potential to lead to substantial risk reductions and that these effects can be modeled at the individual room level. These results exemplify how such simulation-based risk analysis can inform decision making and prioritization under great uncertainty.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementNo external funding was received for this work. It was funded by internal University of Michigan funds.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:This study was reviewed by the University of Michigan Institutional Review Board. The assigned study number is HUM00206822. This study was judged by the University of Michigan Institutional Review Board to be exempt from ongoing oversight.All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesThe code for this model will be made available after the journal version of the paper is published.