PT - JOURNAL ARTICLE AU - Goel, Aastha AU - Chowdhury, Souradeep AU - Ghosh, Tamoghna AU - Singh, Anupam AU - Kumar, Arvind AU - Wig, Naveet TI - Determination of utility of 3 minute and 6 minute walk tests in assessment of progression of mild COVID-19 infection at a tertiary hospital in North India AID - 10.1101/2021.10.03.21264476 DP - 2021 Jan 01 TA - medRxiv PG - 2021.10.03.21264476 4099 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/10/04/2021.10.03.21264476.short 4100 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/10/04/2021.10.03.21264476.full AB - Introduction There have been 214 million confirmed cases of COVID-19 worldwide with a total death tally of 4.4 million. The current study aims to determine the predictive value of 3 minute and 6-minute walk tests in assessment of progression of mild COVID-19 infection at a tertiary care hospital in North India.Methods The study population consisted of adults (age more than 18 years) with a confirmed diagnosis of Covid-19 by RT-PCR on nasopharyngeal specimens. Patients with only mild illness were enrolled. After the patients were admitted to the isolation ward, the presenting history, comorbidity status, vital signs and laboratory parameters were recorded. The 3 and 6 minute walk test was performed daily from admission till discharge or progression of severity of COVID-19 and it was used to calculate BDS and NEWS2 scores.Results Our study consisted of 50 patients with 34 (68%) males and the mean (SD) age of the patient population being 28.1 (6.4) years. The most common symptoms were fever, sore throat, and cough. All laboratory parameters were within normal ranges for all the patients. 96% recovered without progression, while only 4% of them progressed to moderate illness. Results of the 3 and 6 minutes walk tests, BDS and NEWS2 scores showed improvement over the course of hospital stay.Conclusions Although the walk tests and the scores improved over time, they failed to predict the disease progression.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis study received no external fundingAuthor DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:Institute Ethics Committee All India Institute of Medical SciencesAll necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesData will be made available on request