RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 A cross-sectional study of COVID-19 knowledge, beliefs and prevention behaviors among adults in Senegal
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2021.09.29.21264312
DO 10.1101/2021.09.29.21264312
A1 Kearney, Matthew D.
A1 Bornstein, Marta
A1 Fall, Marieme
A1 Nianogo, Roch
A1 Glik, Deborah
A1 Massey, Philip M.
YR 2021
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/09/30/2021.09.29.21264312.abstract
AB Background COVID-19 is an ongoing threat to global public health since its emergence at the end of 2019, yet little is known about how populations in francophone West Africa have responded to COVID-19 in their daily lives. Senegal, in particular, has been noted for its relative success in mitigating the spread and impact of COVID-19. We report original research findings on COVID-19 beliefs and prevention behaviors in a sample of Senegalese adults.Methods A multi-modal cross-sectional study was conducted to describe COVID-19 beliefs and prevention behaviors in a sample of Senegalese adults and to identify potential predictors of prevention behaviors. Univariate, bivariate, and multivariate statistics were generated to describe the sample and explore potential correlations.Results Mask wearing, hand washing, and use of hand sanitizer were most frequently reported. Social distancing and staying at home were also reported albeit to a lower degree. We also identified a range of psychosocial and demographic predictors for COVID-19 prevention behaviors. Men, compared to women, had lower odds (OR=0.59) of reporting prevention behaviors. Rural residents (vs. urban; OR=1.49) and participants with at least a high school education (vs. less than high school education; OR=1.33) were more likely to report COVID-19 prevention behaviors.Discussion Stakeholders and decision makers in Senegal and across Africa can use place-based evidence like ours to address COVID-19 risk factors and intervene effectively with policies and programming. Use of both phone and online surveys enhances representation and study generalizability and should be considered in future research with hard-to-reach populations.Strengths and limitations of this studyThe main strength of our study is the use of a multi-modal data collection strategy, online and via telephone. Had we relied on a single method, our sample’s demographic characteristics would likely have differed while also introducing selection bias.Our recruitment strategy may have also increased the potential for selection bias because participants were recruited online and on-the-ground in Senegal; thus, all participants, by the nature of the recruitment methods, had access to the internet and/or a cell phone. To address potential confounding between recruitment methods, we controlled for recruitment method in our multivariate regression modelling.Prior to our study, little evidence was available about how populations in francophone West Africa have responded to COVID-19 in their daily lives. We adapted pre-existing research panels and developed novel data collection instruments to capture information about COVID-19, and this may serve as a model for the responsiveness of ongoing scholarship to future global events.A study with a larger sample may have been able to identify relationships between knowledge and behaviors, and our study was not design with enough statistical power to detect significant differences.The findings of our study may not be generalizable beyond Senegal, or more specifically Senegalese adults.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis study received funding from the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation (OPP1181104). Disclaimer. The study sponsors had no role in study design, data collection, data analysis, our decision to publish, or preparing the manuscript.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:All study procedures and protocols were reviewed by and approved or determined to be exempt by Drexel University's institutional ethical review board (Protocol ID: 00015164).All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesNo data are available.