RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Clinical Annotations for Prostate Cancer Research: Defining Data Elements, Creating a Reproducible Analytical Pipeline, and Assessing Data Quality
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2021.09.20.21263842
DO 10.1101/2021.09.20.21263842
A1 Keegan, Niamh M.
A1 Vasselman, Samantha E.
A1 Barnett, Ethan S.
A1 Nweji, Barbara
A1 Carbone, Emily A.
A1 Blum, Alexander
A1 Morris, Michael J.
A1 Rathkopf, Dana E.
A1 Slovin, Susan F.
A1 Danila, Daniel C.
A1 Autio, Karen A.
A1 Kantoff, Philip W.
A1 Abida, Wassim
A1 Stopsack, Konrad H.
YR 2021
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/09/27/2021.09.20.21263842.abstract
AB Background Routine clinical data from clinical charts are indispensable for retrospective and prospective observational studies and clinical trials. Their reproducibility is often not assessed.Objective To develop a prostate cancer-specific database with a defined source hierarchy for clinical annotations in conjunction with molecular profiling and to evaluate data reproducibility.Design, setting, and participants For men with prostate cancer and clinical-grade paired tumor–normal sequencing, we performed team-based retrospective data collection from the electronic medical record at a comprehensive cancer center. We developed an open-source R package for data processing. We assessed reproducibility using blinded repeat annotation by a reference medical oncologist.Outcome measurements and statistical analysis We evaluated completeness of data elements, reproducibility of team-based annotation compared to the reference, and impact of measurement error on bias in survival analyses.Results and limitations Data elements on demographics, diagnosis and staging, disease state at the time of procuring a genomically characterized sample, and clinical outcomes were piloted and then abstracted for 2,261 patients (with 2,631 samples). Completeness of data elements was generally high. Comparing to the repeat annotation by a medical oncologist blinded to the database (100 patients/samples), reproducibility of annotations was high to very high; T stage, metastasis date, and presence and date of castration resistance had lower reproducibility. Impact of measurement error on estimates for strong prognostic factors was modest.Conclusions With a prostate cancer-specific data dictionary and quality control measures, manual clinical annotations by a multidisciplinary team can be scalable and reproducible. The data dictionary and the R package for reproducible data processing are freely available to increase data quality in clinical prostate cancer research.Patient summary Information in the medical record is the backbone for clinical research on prostate cancer. The tools provided in this study can increase quality and efficiency of this research.Competing Interest StatementM.J. Morris is an uncompensated consultant for Bayer, Advanced Accelerator Applications, Johnson and Johnson, Novartis, and Lantheus. He is a compensated consultant for Oric, Curium, Athenex, Exelexis, and Astra Zeneca. MSK receives funds for contracts for the conduct of clinical trials from Bayer, Advanced Accelerator Applications, Novartis, Corcept, Roche/Genentech, and Janssen. D.E. Rathkopf is a consultant for Janssen, Genentech, AstraZeneca, Bayer, and Myovant Sciences, and has received research funding through her institution from Janssen Oncology, Medivation, Celgene, Tekeda, Millennium, Ferring, Novartis, Taiho Pharmaceutical, AstraZeneca, Genentech/Roche, TRACON Pharma, Bayer, and Phosplatin Therapeutics. S.F. Slovin has received research support from Sanofi-Aventis, Novartis, Poseida, and the Prostate Cancer Foundation, and honoraria for advisory boards from Clovis, Janssen, Sanofi-Aventis, and PER. D.C. Danila has received research support from the U.S. Department of Defense, American Society of Clinical Oncology, Prostate Cancer Foundation, Stand Up 2 Cancer, Janssen Research & Development, Astellas, Medivation, Agensys, Genentech, and CreaTV; he is a consultant for Angle LLT, Axiom LLT, Janssen Research & Development, Astellas, Medivation, Pfizer, Genzyme, and Agensys. P.W. Kantoff reports the following disclosures for the last 24-month period: he has investment interest in ConvergentRx Therapeutics, Context Therapeutics LLC, DRGT, Placon, and Seer Biosciences; he is a company board member for ConvergentRx Therapeutics, Context Therapeutics LLC; he is a consultant/scientific advisory board member for Bavarian Nordic Immunotherapeutics, DRGT, GE Healthcare, Janssen, OncoCellMDX, Progenity, Seer Biosciences, and Tarveda Therapeutics; and he serves on data safety monitoring boards for Genentech/Roche and Merck. W. Abida reports the following disclosures: he has received honoraria from CARET, Roche, Medscape, and Aptitude Health; is a consultant for Clovis Oncology, Janssen, MORE Health, ORIC Pharmaceuticals, and Daiichi Sankyo; he has received research funding through his institution from AstraZeneca, Zenith Epigenetics, Clovis Oncology, GlaxoSmithKline, ORIC Pharmaceuticals, and Epizyme; and he has had travel/accommodations/expenses paid by GlaxoSmithKline, Clovis Oncology, and ORIC Pharmaceuticals. N.M. Keegan, S.E. Vasselman, E.S. Barnett, B. Nweji, E.A. Carbone, A. Blum, K.A. Autio, and K.H. Stopsack report no potential conflict of interest.Funding StatementThis work was funded in part by the National Cancer Institute (1P01CA228696, to P.W. Kantoff; P30CA008748, Cancer Center Support Grant; P50CA092629, Prostate Cancer SPORE) and the Department of Defense (Early Investigator Research Award W81XWH-18-1-0330, to K.H. Stopsack; Physician Research Award W81XWH-17-1-0124, to W. Abida). D.E. Rathkopf, W. Abida, and K.H. Stopsack are Prostate Cancer Foundation Young Investigators. The funders had no role in the design and conduct of the study; collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of the data; and preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:All participants provided written informed consent for an observational research study approved by the institutional review board at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center. The study was conducted in accordance with the U.S. Common Rule.All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesData definitions to create the REDCap database, the prostateredcap R package, an overview of data elements recommended for analysis, and an example dataset are available at https://stopsack.github.io/prostateredcap. https://stopsack.github.io/prostateredcap