PT  - JOURNAL ARTICLE
AU  - Nakornchai, Tagore
AU  - Conci, Elena
AU  - Hensiek, Anke
AU  - Brown, J William L
TI  - Clinician and patient experience of neurology telephone consultations during the COVID-19 pandemic
AID  - 10.1101/2021.09.26.21264141
DP  - 2021 Jan 01
TA  - medRxiv
PG  - 2021.09.26.21264141
4099  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/09/27/2021.09.26.21264141.short
4100  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/09/27/2021.09.26.21264141.full
AB  - Background Telephone consultations are already employed in specific neurological settings. At Cambridge University Hospitals, the COVID-19 pandemic initially prompted almost all face-to-face appointments to be delivered by telephone, providing a uniquely unselected population to assess.Objectives We explored patient and clinician experience of telephone consultations; and whether telephone consultations might be preferable for pre-identifiable subgroups of patients after the pandemic.Methods Clinicians delivering neurological consultations converted to telephone between April-July 2020 were invited to complete a questionnaire following each consult (430 respondents) and the corresponding patients were subsequently surveyed (290 respondents). The questionnaires assessed clinician and patient goal achievement (and the reasons for any dissatisfaction). Clinicians also described consultation duration (in comparison to face-to-face) while patients detailed comparative convenience and preference.Results The majority of clinicians (335/430, 78%) and patients (227/290, 78%) achieved their consultation goals by telephone, particularly during follow-up consultations (clinicians 272/329, 83%, patients 176/216, 81%) and in some disease subgroups (e.g. seizures/epilepsy (clinicians 114/122 (93%), patients 71/81 (88%)). 95% of telephone consultations were estimated to take the same or less time than an equivalent face-to-face consultation. Most patients found telephone consultations convenient (69%) with 149/211 (71%) indicating they would like telephone or video consultations to play some role in their future follow-up.Conclusion Telephone consultations appear effective, convenient and popular in prespecified subgroups of neurological outpatients. Further work comparing telephone, video and face-to-face consultations across multiple centres is now needed.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementNo External funding was recieved for this study.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:This study was approved by the by the Cambridge University Hospitals clinical governance department.All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesThe data that support the findings of this study and the code used to analyse the data are available from the corresponding author, upon reasonable request.