RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Connecting Artificial Intelligence and Primary Care Challenges: Findings from a Multi-Stakeholder Collaborative Consultation
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2021.09.21.21263906
DO 10.1101/2021.09.21.21263906
A1 Kueper, Jacqueline K.
A1 Terry, Amanda L.
A1 Bahniwal, Ravninder
A1 Meredith, Leslie
A1 Beleno, Ron
A1 Brown, Judith Belle
A1 Dang, Janet
A1 Leger, Daniel
A1 McKay, Scott
A1 Ryan, Bridget L.
A1 Zwarenstein, Merrick
A1 Lizotte, Daniel J.
YR 2021
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/09/26/2021.09.21.21263906.abstract
AB Despite widespread advancements in and envisioned uses for artificial intelligence (AI), few examples of successfully implemented AI innovations exist in primary care (PC) settings.Objectives To identify priority areas for AI and PC in Ontario, Canada.Methods A collaborative consultation event engaged multiple stakeholders in a nominal group technique process to generate, discuss, and rank ideas for how AI can support Ontario PC.Results The consultation process produced nine ranked priorities: 1) preventative care and risk profiling, 2) patient self-management of condition(s), 3) management and synthesis of information, 4) improved communication between PC and AI stakeholders, 5) data sharing and interoperability, 6-tie) clinical decision support, 6-tie) administrative staff support, 8) practitioner clerical and routine task support, and 9) increased mental health care capacity and support. Themes emerging from small group discussions about barriers, implementation issues, and resources needed to support the priorities included: equity and the digital divide; system capacity and culture; data availability and quality; legal and ethical issues; user-centered design; patient-centredness; and proper evaluation of AI-driven tool implementation.Discussion Findings provide guidance for future work on AI and PC. There are immediate opportunities to use existing resources to develop and test AI for priority areas at the patient, provider, and system level. For larger-scale, sustainable innovations, there is a need for longer-term projects that lay foundations around data and interdisciplinary work.Conclusion Study findings can be used to inform future research and development of AI for PC, and to guide resource planning and allocation.What is already known?– The field of artificial intelligence and primary care is underdeveloped.What does this paper add?– An environmental scan without geographic location restriction identified 110 artificial intelligence-driven tools with potential relevance to primary care that existed around the time of the study.– A multi-stakeholder consultation session identified nine priorities to guide future work on artificial intelligence and primary care in Ontario, Canada.– Priorities for artificial intelligence and primary care include provider, patient, and system level uses as well as foundational areas related to data and interdisciplinary communication.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis study was part of an INSPIRE-PHC Applied Health Research Question grant funded through the Ontario Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care. Views expressed do not necessarily reflect those of the Province.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:The project was approved by the Western Health Sciences REB (Project ID 116208).All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesData related to ranked items are provided in the manuscript or supplementary material. Raw notes from small group discussion will not be made available.