PT - JOURNAL ARTICLE AU - Hennein, Rachel AU - Ggita, Joseph M. AU - Turimumahoro, Patricia AU - Ochom, Emmanuel AU - Gupta, Amanda J. AU - Katamba, Achilles AU - Armstrong-Hough, Mari AU - Davis, J. Lucian TI - Functional components of a community of practice to improve community health worker performance: A qualitative study AID - 10.1101/2021.09.21.21263835 DP - 2021 Jan 01 TA - medRxiv PG - 2021.09.21.21263835 4099 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/09/26/2021.09.21.21263835.short 4100 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/09/26/2021.09.21.21263835.full AB - Background Communities of Practice (CoPs) are a low-cost strategy for health workers to share and create knowledge through social interactions to improve the delivery of high-quality care. However, there remain critical gaps in understanding the behavioral mechanisms through which CoPs can facilitate community health worker’s (CHWs) performance. Therefore, we carried out a qualitative study of a CoP to identify the behavior change techniques (BCTs) and intervention functions that improved CHWs’ performance.Methods We organized CHWs from two tuberculosis (TB) clinics in Kampala, Uganda into a CoP from February to August 2018. We conducted interviews with CoP members to understand their perceptions of how the CoP influenced delivery of TB contact investigation. Using an abductive approach, we first applied inductive codes characterizing CHWs’ perceptions of how the CoP activities affected their delivery of contact investigation. We then systematically mapped these codes into their functional categories using the BCT Taxonomy and Behavior Change Wheel framework. We triangulated all interview findings with detailed field notes.Results All eight members of the CoP agreed to participate in the interviews. CHWs identified five CoP activities as improving the quality of their work: (1) individual review of feedback reports, (2) collaborative improvement meetings, (3) real-time communications among members, (4) didactic education sessions, and (5) clinic-wide staff meetings. These activities represented nine different BCTs and five distinct intervention functions. Taken together, CoP meetings enabled members to foster social support, problem solving, and knowledge sharing. The CoP enabled CHWs to identify barriers they face in the field and develop solutions. The CoP was motivating, strengthened their social and professional identities within and outside of the group, and improved their self-efficacy.Conclusions We identified several behavioral mechanisms through which CoPs may improve CHW performance. Future studies should evaluate the importance of these mechanisms in mediating the effects of CoPs on program effectiveness.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis work was supported by the NIH Medical Scientist Training Program Training Grant T32GM007205, which provided funding for RH. The funder had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:The Makerere University School of Public Health Higher Degrees Research Ethics Committee and the Yale University Human Investigation Committee approved the study.All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesData will be available upon requestBCTBehavior Change TechniqueCHWCommunity Health WorkerCoPCommunity of PracticeCOREQConsolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative ResearchNTLPNational TB and Leprosy ProgramTBTuberculosisTIDieRTemplate for Intervention Description and Replication