RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Young Zambian infants with symptomatic RSV and pertussis infections are frequently prescribed inappropriate antibiotics
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2021.09.21.21263905
DO 10.1101/2021.09.21.21263905
A1 Gunning, CE
A1 Rohani, P
A1 Mwananyanda, L
A1 Kwenda, G
A1 Mupila, Z
A1 Gill, CJ
YR 2021
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/09/26/2021.09.21.21263905.abstract
AB Pediatric community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) remains a pressing global health concern, particulary in low-resource settings where diagnosis and treatment rely on empiric, symptoms-based guidelines such as the WHO’s Integrated Management of Childhood Illness (IMCI). This study details the delivery of IMCI-based health care in a cohort of 1,320 young infants and their mothers in a low-resource urban community in Lusaka, Zambia. We prospectively monitored mother/infant pairs across infants’ first four months of life, recording symptoms of respiratory infection and antibiotics prescriptions (predominantly penicillins), and tested nasopharyngeal (NP) samples for Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) and Bordetella pertussis. Symptoms and antibiotics use were more common in infants (43% and 15.7%) than in mothers (16.6% and 8%), while RSV and B. pertussis were observed at similar rates in infants (2.7% and 32.5%) and mothers (2% and 35.5%), albeit frequently at very low levels. In infants, we observed strong associations between symptoms, pathogen detection, and antibiotics use. Critically, we demonstrate that non-macrolide antibiotics were commonly prescribed for pertussis infections, some of which persisted across many weeks. We speculate that improved diagnostic specificity and/or clinician education paired with timely, appropriate treatment of pertussis could substantially reduce the burden of this disease while reducing the off-target use of penicillins.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementLab testing and subsequent analyses for this paper were supported by a grant from the National Institutes of Health/National Institute of Allergies and Infectious Diseases (R01AI133080). Funding for the initial SAMIPS study that allowed us to create the sample library itself was through the generous support of the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation (OPP1105094).Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:The data for this analysis came from the Southern African Mother Infant Pertussis study (SAMIPS). SAMIPS received ethical approval from the ERES converge IRB in Lusaka, and the IRB at Boston University Medical Center. The current analysis however uses a data set that was deidentified at the request of the NIH for the R01 grant that supported this subsequent work. The current data sets contain NO links to participants.All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesData and code will be provided at OSF at time of publication. https://osf.io/tnkyu/