RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Risk factors for early childhood growth faltering in rural Cambodia
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2021.05.20.21257338
DO 10.1101/2021.05.20.21257338
A1 Lai, Amanda
A1 Velez, Irene
A1 Ambikapathi, Ramya
A1 Seng, Krisna
A1 Cumming, Oliver
A1 Brown, Joe
YR 2021
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/09/24/2021.05.20.21257338.abstract
AB Introduction Inadequate nutrition in early life and exposure to sanitation-related enteric pathogens have been linked to poor growth outcomes in children. Despite rapid development in Cambodia, high prevalence of growth faltering and stunting continue to persist. This study aimed to assess nutrition and WASH variables and their association with nutritional status of children under 24 months in rural Cambodia.Methods We conducted surveys in 491 villages across 55 rural communes in Cambodia in September 2016 to measure associations between child, household, and community-level risk factors for stunting and length-for-age z-score (LAZ). A primary survey measured child-level variables, including anthropometric measures and risk factors for growth faltering and stunting, for 4,036 children under 24 months of age from 3,877 households (approximately 8 households per village). For LAZ, we calculated bivariate and adjusted associations (as mean differences) with 95% confidence intervals using generalised estimating equations (GEEs) to fit linear regression models with robust standard errors. For stunting, we calculated unadjusted and adjusted prevalence ratios (PRs) with 95% confidence intervals using GEEs to fit Poisson regression models with robust standard errors. For all models assessing effects of household-level variables, we used GEEs to account for clustering at the village level.Results After adjustment for potential confounding, presence of water and soap at a household’s handwashing station was found to be significantly associated (p<0.05) with increased LAZ (adjusted mean difference in LAZ +0.10, 95% CI: 0.03, 0.16), and household use of an improved drinking water source was associated with less stunting in children compared to households that did not use an improved source of drinking water (aPR 0.81, 95% CI: 0.66, 0.98); breastfeeding was associated with a lower LAZ score (−0.16, 95% CI: −0.27, −0.05). No other feeding practices (i.e., dietary diversity, meal frequency, minimum acceptable diet) or sanitation variables (i.e., household’s safe disposal of child stools, household-level sanitation, community-level sanitation) were associated with LAZ scores or stunting in children under 24 months of age. In an age-stratified analysis, children under 12 months of age were longer (LAZ +0.12, 95% CI: 0.02, 0.21) if there was presence of water and soap at the household handwashing station; at the community level, higher prevalence of shared sanitation (percentage of households in a village who report to use shared sanitation facilities) was negatively associated with child length (LAZ - 0.36, 95% CI: −0.66, −0.07).Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementUnited States Agency for International Development. The contents of this publication are the sole responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of USAID or the United States Government.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:This study and protocols for data collection and analysis were approved by the National Ethics Committee for Health Research in Cambodia (ref: 110NECHR) and the Internal Review Board at the Georgia Institute of Technology.All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesThe data that support the findings of this study are openly available in OSF, DOI 10.17605/OSF.IO/56HPJ.