RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 The influence of baseline clinical status and surgical strategy on early good to excellent result in spinal lumbar arthrodesis: a machine learning approach
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2021.09.17.21263625
DO 10.1101/2021.09.17.21263625
A1 Langella, Francesco
A1 Ventriglia, Luca
A1 Compagnone, Domenico
A1 Barletta, Paolo
A1 Huber, David
A1 Mangili, Francesca
A1 Licandro, Ginevra
A1 Galbusera, Fabio
A1 Cina, Andrea
A1 Bassani, Tito
A1 Lamartina, Claudio
A1 Scaramuzzo, Laura
A1 Bassani, Roberto
A1 Brayda-Bruno, Marco
A1 Villafañe, Jorge Hugo
A1 Berjano, Pedro
A1 Azzimonti, Laura
YR 2021
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/09/22/2021.09.17.21263625.abstract
AB Aims To create, using a machine learning (ML) approach, a preoperative model from baseline demographic and health-related quality of life scores (HRQOL) to predict a good to excellent early clinical outcome.Patients and Methods A single spine surgery center retrospective review of prospectively collected data from January 2016 to December 2020 from the institutional registry (SpineREG) was performed. The inclusion criteria were age ≥ 18 years, both sexes, lumbar arthrodesis procedure, a complete follow up assessment (ODI, SF-36 and COMI back) and the capability to read and understand the Italian language. A delta of improvement of the ODI higher than 12.7/100 was considered a “good early outcome”. A combined target model of ODI (Δ ≥ 12.7/100), SF-36 PCS (Δ ≥ 6/100) and COMI back (Δ ≥ 2.2/10) was considered an “excellent early outcome”. The performance of the ML models was evaluated in terms of sensitivity, i.e., True Positive Rate (TPR), specificity, i.e., True Negative Rate (TNR), accuracy and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC ROC).Results A total of 1243 patients were included in this study. The model for predicting ODI at 6 months follow up showed a good balance between sensitivity (74.3%) and specificity (79.4%), while providing a good accuracy (75.8%) with ROC AUC = 0.842. The combined target model showed a sensitivity of 74.2% and specificity of 71.8%, with an accuracy of 72.8%, and a ROC AUC = 0.808.Conclusion The results of our study suggest that a machine learning approach showed high performance in predicting early good to excellent clinical results.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Clinical TrialNot a prospective clinical study.Funding StatementThe project was supported with funds from the Italian Ministry of Health (project code CO-2016-02364645).Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:The research has been approved by the Ethics Committee of Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy (protocol "SPINEREG" approved on April 13th, 2016).All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesData are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.