PT - JOURNAL ARTICLE AU - Raffington, L. AU - Tanksley, P. AU - Vinnik, L. AU - Sabhlok, A. AU - Patterson, M.W. AU - Mallard, T. AU - Malanchini, M. AU - Ayorech, Z. AU - Tucker-Drob, E.M. AU - Harden, K.P. TI - Socially stratified DNA-methylation profiles are associated with disparities in child and adolescent mental health AID - 10.1101/2021.09.17.21263582 DP - 2021 Jan 01 TA - medRxiv PG - 2021.09.17.21263582 4099 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/09/21/2021.09.17.21263582.short 4100 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/09/21/2021.09.17.21263582.full AB - Importance Economic and racial inequality is linked to disparities in children’s mental health. Biomarkers that reflect these social disparities are lacking.Objective We examined the hypothesis that salivary DNA-methylation patterns of higher inflammation and faster pace of biological aging are economically, racially and ethnically stratified and are associated with child mental health.Design The Texas Twin Project is an on-going, observational, longitudinal study that began in May 2012. Analyses were preregistered on May 7, 2021, and completed on August 23, 2021.Setting The population-based study identified and recruited participants from public school rosters in the greater Austin area.Participants Participants in the analytic data set included all participants that agreed to contribute DNA samples and whose samples were assayed by January 2021.Exposures Family- and neighborhood-level socioeconomic inequality, racial and ethnic identities (White, Latinx, Black, Asian).Main Measure(s) Environmental exposures were analyzed in relation to salivary DNA- methylation profiles of higher inflammation (DNAm-CRP) and faster pace of biological aging (DunedinPoAm). Child internalizing problems, attention problems, aggression, rule-breaking, ADHD, oppositional defiant disorder, and conduct disorder were measured using parent-reports and self-reports on abbreviated versions of the Achenbach Child Behavior Checklist and Conners 3. The hypotheses being tested were formulated after data collection of the present data freeze and were pre-registered prior to analyses being conducted.Results In a sample of N=1,183 8-to-19-year-olds (609 female, age M=13.38y), children’s salivary DNA-methylation profiles and psychiatric symptoms differed by socioeconomic conditions, race and ethnicity. Children with more parent-reported internalizing symptoms had higher DNAm-CRP (r=0.15, 95% CI=0.05 to 0.25, P=0.004) and DunedinPoAm (r=0.15, CI=0.05 to 0.25, P=0.002), and children with more parent-reported aggression problems had higher DNAm-CRP (r=0.17, CI=0.04 to 0.31, P=0.013). DNAm-CRP partially mediated advantage of higher family socioeconomic status (16% of total effect) and White racial identity (12% of total effect) on reduced internalizing symptoms. DunedinPoAm also partially mediated advantage of White racial identity on internalizing (19% of total effect).Conclusions and Relevance Socioeconomic and racial inequality are visible in children’s epigenetic profiles of inflammation and the rate of biological aging in a manner that is tied to social disparities in mental health.Key PointsQuestion: We examined whether salivary DNA-methylation profiles are socially stratified and associated with child mental health.Findings: In this preregistered, cross-sectional observational study of 1,183 children and adolescents, socioeconomic, racial, and ethnic disparities in mental health were associated with salivary DNA-methylation profiles of inflammation and the pace of biological aging.Meaning: DNA-methylation biomarkers hold promise as tools to quantify the biological impact of socioeconomic inequality and being racially minoritized in a manner that is tied to social disparities in mental health.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementWe gratefully acknowledge all participants of the Texas Twin Project. This research was supported by National Institutes of Health (NIH) grants R01HD083613 and R01HD092548. LR was supported by the German Research Foundation (DFG). MWP was supported by a training grant from NIMH, T32MH015442. ZA is supported by a Marie Skłodowska-Curie Fellowship from the European Union (894675). KPH and EMTD are Faculty Research Associates of the Population Research Center at the University of Texas at Austin, which is supported by a NIH grant P2CHD042849. EMTD is a member of the Center on Aging and Population Sciences (CAPS) at The University of Texas at Austin, which is supported by NIH grant P30AG066614. KPH and EMTD were also supported by Jacobs Foundation Research Fellowships. LR and KPH had full access to all the data in the study and take responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:The University of Texas at Austin Institutional Review board granted ethical approval.All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesParticipants are drawn from a unique population (twins) from a tightly-defined geographic region. In addition, participants are sampled from a vulnerable population (children), many of whom are ethnic minorities and/or live in low income contexts. Finally participants provide highly sensitive psychological, economic, academic, and genetic information. Thus because of the vulnerable status of many participants in the sample, the strong potential for deductive identification, and the sensitive nature of the information collected, data from the Texas Twin Project are not shared with individuals outside of the research team.