RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Correlates of COVID-19 vaccine acceptance, hesitancy and refusal among employees of a safety net California county health system with an early and aggressive vaccination program: Results from a cross-sectional survey
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2021.09.14.21263588
DO 10.1101/2021.09.14.21263588
A1 Gatto, Nicole M.
A1 Lee, Jerusha E.
A1 Massai, Donatella
A1 Zamarripa, Susanna
A1 Sasaninia, Bijan
A1 Khurana, Dhruv
A1 Michaels, Kelsey
A1 Freund, Deborah
A1 Nightingale, Judi
A1 Firek, Anthony
A1 ,
YR 2021
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/09/20/2021.09.14.21263588.abstract
AB Information on vaccine acceptance among healthcare workers is needed as health professionals provide front line care to COVID-19 patients. We developed and implemented an anonymous internet-based cross-sectional survey with direct solicitation among employees of a safety net health system. Items queried demographic and health-related characteristics, experience with and knowledge of COVID-19, and determinants of decisions to vaccinate. COVID-19 vaccine acceptance groups (acceptors, hesitant, refusers) were defined; an adapted version of the WHO vaccine hesitancy scale was included. The survey demonstrated good reliability (Cronbach’s alpha = 0.92 for vaccine hesitancy scale; 0.93 for determinants). General linear and logistic regression methods examined factors which were univariately associated with vaccine hesitancy and vaccine acceptance, respectively. Multivariable models were constructed with stepwise model-building procedures. Race/ethnicity, marital status, job classification, immunocompromised status, flu vaccination and childhood vaccination opinions independently predicted hesitancy scale scores. Gender, education, job classification and BMI independently predicted acceptance, hesitancy and refusal groups. Among hesitant employees, uncertainty was reflected in reports of motivating factors influencing their indecision. Despite a strong employee-support environment and job protection, respondents reported physical and mental health effects. Appreciation of varied reasons for refusing vaccination should lead to culturally sensitive interventions to increase vaccination rates in healthcare workers.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis research received no external funding.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:All respondents consented to participate in the survey by clicking next after introductory text and instructions on how to complete the survey. The study was reviewed by the RUHS Institutional Review Board and classified as exempt as all responses were collected in a de-identified manner. All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesThe data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author.