PT  - JOURNAL ARTICLE
AU  - Cabric, Vanja
AU  - Harrison, Rebecca
AU  - Gauthier, Lynn R.
AU  - Graham, Carol A
AU  - Gagliese, Lucia
TI  - How do we measure the adequacy of cancer pain management? Testing the performance of 4 commonly used measures and steps towards measurement refinement
AID  - 10.1101/2021.09.13.21263529
DP  - 2021 Jan 01
TA  - medRxiv
PG  - 2021.09.13.21263529
4099  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/09/16/2021.09.13.21263529.short
4100  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/09/16/2021.09.13.21263529.full
AB  - Although pain is the most common and disabling cancer symptom requiring management, the best index of cancer pain management adequacy is unknown. While the Pain Management Index is most commonly used, other indices have included relief, satisfaction, and pain intensity. We evaluated their correlations and agreement, compared their biopsychosocial correlates, and investigated whether they represented a single construct reflecting the adequacy of cancer pain management in 269 people with advanced cancer and pain. Despite moderate-to-severe average pain in 52.8% of participants, 85.1% had PMI scores suggesting adequate analgesia, pain relief was moderate and satisfaction was high. Correlations and agreement were low-to-moderate, suggesting low construct validity. Although the correlates of pain management adequacy were multidimensional, including lower pain interference, neuropathic and nociceptive pain, and catastrophizing, shorter cancer duration, and greater physical symptoms, no single index captured this multidimensionality. Principal component analysis demonstrated a single underlying construct, thus we constructed the Adequacy of Cancer Pain Management from factor loadings. It had somewhat better agreement, however correlates were limited to pain interference and neuropathic pain. This study demonstrates the psychometric shortcomings of commonly used indices. We provide suggestions for future research to improve measurement, a critical step in optimizing cancer pain management.Perspective The Pain Management Index and other commonly used indices of cancer pain management adequacy have poor construct validity. This study provides suggestions to improve the measurement of the adequacy of cancer pain management.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis work was supported by awards from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR MOP-62866) and the Canada Foundation for Innovation to LG. LRG is supported by a Fonds de recherche - Sante de Quebec Research Scholars Junior 1 award in partnership with the Quebec Breast Cancer Foundation and the Fondation J.-Louis Levesque. These funding sources had no involvement in the study design, the collection, analysis, and interpretation of the data, the writing of the report, and the decision to submit the article for publication.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:Ethical approval was obtained from the research ethics boards of the University Health Network, York University and Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, Canada.All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesData may be available upon reasonable request.