RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 SARS-CoV-2 serology across scales: a framework for unbiased seroprevalence estimation incorporating antibody kinetics and epidemic recency
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2021.09.09.21263139
DO 10.1101/2021.09.09.21263139
A1 Takahashi, Saki
A1 Peluso, Michael J.
A1 Hakim, Jill
A1 Turcios, Keirstinne
A1 Janson, Owen
A1 Routledge, Isobel
A1 Busch, Michael P.
A1 Hoh, Rebecca
A1 Tai, Viva
A1 Kelly, J. Daniel
A1 Martin, Jeffrey N.
A1 Deeks, Steven G.
A1 Henrich, Timothy J.
A1 Greenhouse, Bryan
A1 Rodríguez-Barraquer, Isabel
YR 2021
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/09/14/2021.09.09.21263139.abstract
AB Serosurveys are a key resource for measuring SARS-CoV-2 cumulative incidence. A growing body of evidence suggests that asymptomatic and mild infections (together making up over 95% of all infections) are associated with lower antibody titers than severe infections. Antibody levels also peak a few weeks after infection and decay gradually. We developed a statistical approach to produce adjusted estimates of seroprevalence from raw serosurvey results that account for these sources of spectrum bias. We incorporate data on antibody responses on multiple assays from a post-infection longitudinal cohort, along with epidemic time series to account for the timing of a serosurvey relative to how recently individuals may have been infected. We applied this method to produce adjusted seroprevalence estimates from five large-scale SARS-CoV-2 serosurveys across different settings and study designs. We identify substantial differences between reported and adjusted estimates of over two-fold in the results of some surveys, and provide a tool for practitioners to generate adjusted estimates with pre-set or custom parameter values. While unprecedented efforts have been launched to generate SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence estimates over this past year, interpretation of results from these studies requires properly accounting for both population-level epidemiologic context and individual-level immune dynamics.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementST is supported by the Schmidt Science Fellows, in partnership with the Rhodes Trust. ST, IR, and IRB acknowledge research funding from the MIDAS Coordination Center COVID-19 Urgent Grant Program (MIDASNI2020-5), by a grant from the National Institute of General Medical Science (3U24GM132013-02S2). IRB is supported by R35GM138361-02.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:The LIINC study was approved by the UCSF IRB #20-30479. All subjects provided written informed consent.All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesRaw antibody data used in this analysis are publicly available in a prior publication (17). Raw serosurvey data are available in the citations in Table 1. Access to COVID-19 seroprevalence data from the Nationwide Commercial Laboratory Seroprevalence Survey is maintained by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's (CDC)'s Epi Task Force Seroprevalence Team. Requests for access to the data should be directed to: eocevent452@cdc.gov. The CDC does not take responsibility for the scientific validity or accuracy of methodology, results, statistical analyses, or conclusions presented.