PT  - JOURNAL ARTICLE
AU  - Curley, William H.
AU  - Bodien, Yelena G.
AU  - Zhou, David W.
AU  - Conte, Mary M.
AU  - Foulkes, Andrea S.
AU  - Giacino, Joseph T.
AU  - Victor, Jonathan D.
AU  - Schiff, Nicholas D.
AU  - Edlow, Brian L.
TI  - Electrophysiological correlates of thalamocortical function in acute severe traumatic brain injury
AID  - 10.1101/2021.09.08.21262992
DP  - 2021 Jan 01
TA  - medRxiv
PG  - 2021.09.08.21262992
4099  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/09/12/2021.09.08.21262992.short
4100  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/09/12/2021.09.08.21262992.full
AB  - Few reliable biomarkers of consciousness exist for patients with acute severe brain injury. Tools assaying the neural networks that modulate consciousness may allow for tracking of recovery. The mesocircuit model, and its instantiation as the ABCD framework, classifies resting-state EEG power spectral densities into categories reflecting widely separated levels of thalamocortical network function and correlates with outcome in post-cardiac arrest coma.We applied the ABCD framework to acute severe traumatic brain injury and tested four hypotheses: 1) EEG channel-level ABCD classifications are spatially heterogeneous and temporally variable; 2) ABCD classifications improve longitudinally, commensurate with the degree of behavioural recovery; 3) ABCD classifications correlate with behavioural level of consciousness; and 4) the Coma Recovery Scale-Revised arousal facilitation protocol improves EEG dynamics along the ABCD scale. In this longitudinal cohort study, we enrolled 20 patients with acute severe traumatic brain injury requiring intensive care and 16 healthy controls. Through visual inspection, channel-level spectra from resting-state EEG were classified based on spectral peaks within frequency bands defined by the ABCD framework: ‘A’ = no peaks above delta (<4 Hz) range (complete thalamocortical disruption); ‘B’ = theta (4-8 Hz) peak (severe thalamocortical disruption); ‘C’ = theta and beta (13-24 Hz) peaks (moderate thalamocortical disruption); or ‘D’ = alpha (8-13 Hz) and beta peaks (normal thalamocortical function). We assessed behavioural level of consciousness with the Coma Recovery Scale-Revised or neurological examination and, in 12 patients, performed repeat EEG and behavioural assessments at ≥6-months post-injury.Acutely, 95% of patients demonstrated ‘D’ signals in at least one channel but exhibited heterogeneity in the proportion of different channel-level ABCD classifications (mean percent ‘D’ signals: 37%, range: 0-90%). By contrast, healthy participants and patients at follow-up predominantly demonstrated signals corresponding to intact thalamocortical network function (mean percent ‘D’ signals: 94%). In patients studied acutely, ABCD classifications improved after the Coma Recovery Scale-Revised arousal facilitation protocol (P<0.05), providing electrophysiological evidence for the effectiveness of this commonly performed technique. ABCD classification did not correspond with behavioural level of consciousness acutely, where patients demonstrated substantial within-session temporal variability in ABCD classifications. However, ABCD classification distinguished patients with and without command-following in the subacute-to-chronic phase of recovery (P<0.01). Patients also demonstrated significant longitudinal improvement in EEG dynamics along the ABCD scale (median change in ‘D’ signals: 37%, P<0.05).These findings support the use of the ABCD framework to characterize channel-level EEG dynamics and track fluctuations in functional thalamocortical network integrity in spatial detail.Competing Interest StatementDr. Giacino occasionally receives honoraria for conducting CRS-R training seminars. The other authors report no competing interests.Funding StatementThis work was supported by the NIH National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (R21NS109627, RF1NS115268), NIH Office of the Director (DP2HD101400), James S. McDonnell Foundation, Tiny Blue Dot Foundation, National Institute on Disability, Independent Living and Rehabilitation Research (NIDILRR), Administration for Community Living (90DP0039, Spaulding-Harvard TBI Model System), Harvard Medical School Office of Scholarly Engagement, and NIH Shared Instrument Grant S10RR023043.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:All studies were approved by the Mass General Brigham Institutional Review Board.All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesThe data that support the findings of this study are available upon reasonable request from the corresponding author and approval from the Institutional Review Board.AbbreviationsCAPConfusional Assessment ProtocolCIconfidence intervalCMDcognitive motor dissociationCRS-RComa Recovery Scale – ReviseddBdecibelsDoCdisorder of consciousnessEMCSemerged from minimally conscious statefunctional MRIfMRIGCSGlasgow Coma ScaleHzHertzICUintensive care unitIQRinterquartile rangeMCS+/-minimally conscious state with/without languagePTCSpost-traumatic confusional stateRMSDroot mean square deviationR-PTCSrecovered from PTCSSDstandard deviationTBItraumatic brain injuryVSvegetative state