PT  - JOURNAL ARTICLE
AU  - Meigh, Neil J.
AU  - Keogh, Justin W.L.
AU  - Rathbone, Evelyne N.
AU  - Hing, Wayne A.
TI  - Change in force profile of the hardstyle kettlebell swing in older adults is small following 16 weeks of training and may not be required to improve physical function: findings from the BELL trial
AID  - 10.1101/2021.08.27.21262528
DP  - 2021 Jan 01
TA  - medRxiv
PG  - 2021.08.27.21262528
4099  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/09/02/2021.08.27.21262528.short
4100  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/09/02/2021.08.27.21262528.full
AB  - Background Hardstyle kettlebell training is characterised by the ballistic two-handed kettlebell swing with outcomes believed to be strongly influenced by swing proficiency. This study examines the effect of four months hardstyle kettlebell training on the force profile of the two-handed kettlebell swing, and peak ground reaction force during a kettlebell deadlift in older adults. These data will help inform healthcare providers and coaches about the use and prescription of kettlebell exercises with older adults.Methods Five males and five females <70 years of age who participated in the BELL trial were recruited. Two-handed hardstyle swings were performed with 8-16 kg, and deadlifts with 8-32 kg. Ground reaction force (GRF) was obtained from a floor-mounted force platform. Force-time curves (FTCs), peak force, forward force relative to vertical force, rate of force development (RFD), and swing cadence were investigated. Results were compared with the same data variables collected from the participants in an exploratory pre-intervention study, conducted approximately seven months before the present study. Participants completed approximately 90 kettlebell training sessions during a four-month training intervention.Results Participants used kettlebells to perform 3779 ± 802 swings, 923 ± 251 cleans, 825 ± 309 snatches and 744 ± 178 deadlifts during group-training sessions. Peak ground reaction force during kettlebell swings did not significantly change with any kettlebell weight. There was a significant 3% increase in the magnitude of forward force during 8 kg swings, and a significant 3% decrease in forward force during 16 kg swings. There were large significant improvements in swing cadence with a mean increase of three swings per minute and a small non-significant increase in RFD. Change in kettlebell swing force-time curve profiles were small. Change in peak ground reaction force during deadlifts were moderate to large. All participants increased in grip strength following training, with the magnitude of change greater than the minimum clinically important difference for seven participants. All participants had significant increases in multiple secondary outcomes.Conclusion Group-based and online kettlebell training is likely to be ineffective for improving the force profile of the hardstyle kettlebell swing in older adults. Insufficiently active older adults engaged in high-volume kettlebell training performed 3-5 times weekly, can however expect to see clinically meaningful improvements in health-related physical fitness irrespective of swing proficiency, and have increased confidence with heavy lifting tasks. Results of this study suggest that beyond safe and competent performance, striving to optimise hardstyle swing technique may provide no additional benefit to clinical outcomes in older adults.Competing Interest StatementNeil J. Meigh is a Physiotherapist and hardstyle kettlebell instructor, with an online presence as The Kettlebell Physio. JK, WH and ER declare no competing interests.Clinical TrialEthical approval for this study was granted by Bond University human research ethics committee (NM03279) which was subsumed within the larger BELL trial project (ACTRN12619001177145).Funding StatementThis study was supported by an Australian Government Research Training Program Scholarship and will contribute towards a Higher Degree by Research Degree (Doctor of Philosophy).Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:Ethical approval for this study was granted by Bond University human research ethics committee (NM03279) which was subsumed within the larger BELL trial project (ACTRN12619001177145).All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesData will be made available in accordance with Bond University Research Data Management and Sharing Policy (TLR 5.12, Sections 9.3, 10.2. 10.5, 10.8). Research data and primary materials will be made openly available for use by other researchers and interested persons for further research after a reasonable period following completion of the research.