PT  - JOURNAL ARTICLE
AU  - Sanmark, Enni
AU  - Oksanen, Lotta-Maria A.H.
AU  - Rantanen, Noora
AU  - Lahelma, Mari
AU  - Anttila, Veli-Jukka
AU  - Lehtonen, Lasse
AU  - Hyvärinen, Antti-Pekka
AU  - Geneid, Ahmed
TI  - AEROSOL GENERATION DURING COUGHING - QUANTITATIVE DEFINITION FOR AEROSOL GENERATING PROCEDURES: OBSERVATIONAL STUDY
AID  - 10.1101/2021.08.24.21262520
DP  - 2021 Jan 01
TA  - medRxiv
PG  - 2021.08.24.21262520
4099  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/08/30/2021.08.24.21262520.short
4100  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/08/30/2021.08.24.21262520.full
AB  - Aim The purpose of the study was to determine aerosol exposure generated by coughing in operation room environments to create a quantitative limit value for high-risk aerosol-generating medical procedures.Background Coughing is known to produce a significant amount of aerosols and is thus commonly used as a best reference for high-risk aerosol-generation. Accordingly, procedures during which aerosol generation exceeds the amount of aerosol generated in instances of coughing are seen as high-risk aerosol generating procedures. However, no reliable quantitative values are available for high-risk aerosol-generation.Methods Coughing was measured from 37 healthy volunteers in the operating room environment. Aerosol particles generated during coughing within the size range of 0.3–10 µm were measured with Optical Particle Sizer from 40cm, 70cm, and 100cm distances. The distances reflected potential exposure distances where personnel are during surgeries.Results A total of 306 coughs were measured. Average aerosol concentration during coughing was 1.580 ± 13.774 particles/cm3 (range 0.000 – 195.528).Discussion The aerosol concentration measured in this study can be used as a limit for high-risk aerosol generation in the operating room environment when assessing the aerosol generating procedures and the risk of operating room staff’s exposure for aerosol particles.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementNo external funding was receivedAuthor DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:All procedures that involved human participants were conducted in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional or national research committee and the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. The Ethics Committee of Helsinki University Hospital approved the study protocol (HUS/1701/2020). All participants provided written informed consent prior to their participation.All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesThe authors confirm that the data supporting the findings of this study are available within the article [and/or] its supplementary materials.(AGP)Aerosol generating procedure(OR)operating room