PT - JOURNAL ARTICLE AU - Lazarus, Rajeka AU - Taucher, Christian AU - Brown, Claire AU - Corbic, Irena AU - Danon, Leon AU - Dubischar, Katrin AU - Duncan, Christopher J.A. AU - Eder-Lingelbach, Susanne AU - Faust, Saul N AU - Green, Christopher AU - Gokani, Karishma AU - Hochreiter, Romana AU - Wright, Johanna Kellett AU - Kwon, Dowan AU - Middleditch, Alexander AU - Munro, Alasdair P.S. AU - Naker, Kush AU - Penciu, Florentina AU - Price, David AU - Querton, Benedicte AU - Riaz, Tawassal AU - Ross-Russell, Amy AU - Sanchez-Gonzalez, Amada AU - Wardle, Hayley AU - Warren, Sarah AU - Finn, Adam AU - , TI - Immunogenicity and safety of inactivated whole virion Coronavirus vaccine with CpG (VLA2001) in healthy adults aged 18 to 55: a randomised phase 1 /2 clinical trial AID - 10.1101/2021.08.13.21262021 DP - 2021 Jan 01 TA - medRxiv PG - 2021.08.13.21262021 4099 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/08/20/2021.08.13.21262021.short 4100 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/08/20/2021.08.13.21262021.full AB - Background We assessed the safety, tolerability and immunogenicity of VLA2001 is a whole-virion inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccine adsorbed to alum with a toll-like receptor 9 agonist adjuvant in healthy volunteers aged 18-55.Methods The first 15 participants were enrolled, in groups of 5, to receive two doses, separated by 21 days, of one of three dose concentrations, administered intramuscularly. 138 further participants were randomised 1:1:1 to receive the same 3 dose concentrations, in a double blinded manner. Primary outcomes were solicited adverse reactions 7 days after each vaccination and neutralising antibody geometric mean titres (GMT) against SARS-CoV-2, 2 weeks after the second vaccination (day 36), measured by live microneutralisation assay against wild-type virus (MNA50). Secondary outcomes included unsolicited adverse events, and humoral and cellular responses at day 36, measured by IgG ELISA against Spike protein and interferon-γ secreting T-cells by ELISpot stimulated with multiple SARS-CoV-2 antigens. (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04671017, ISRCTN 82411169)Findings Between December 16, 2020 and January 21, 2021, 153 participants were enrolled and randomised evenly between the dose groups. The rates of solicited reactions were similar after the first and second doses and between the three dose groups. The most frequent local reactions were tenderness (58·2%) and pain (41·8%) and systemic reactions were headache (46%) and fatigue (39·2%).In the high dose group, two weeks following the second dose, the geometric mean titres were 530.4 (95% CI: 421·49, 667·52) for neutralizing antibodies and 2147·9 (95% CI: 1705·98, 2704·22) for S-binding antibodies. There was a dose dependent response with 90·0% (95% CI:78·0%.,97·0%) seroconversion (4-fold rise) at day 36 in the high dose group, which was significantly higher than rates in both the medium (73.5%; 95% CI: 59%,85%), CIs) and low dose (51%; 95%CI: 37%,65%) rate, CIs) groups (both p < 0.001). Antigen-specific interferon-γ T-cells reactive against the S, M and N proteins were observed in 76, 36 and 49% of high dose recipients, respectively.Interpretation VLA2001-201 was well tolerated and produced both humoral and cellular immune responses, with a clear dose-response effect.Funding This study was funded by the Department of Health and Social Care, UKThe funder had no role in the study design, implementation or analysis.Competing Interest StatementCT, BQ, KD, SE-L and RH are all employees of Valneva. RL has worked on trials funded by Aztra Zeneca and Janssen but receives no personal financial payment for this work. AF is a member of the Joint Committee on Vaccination and Immunisation and Chair of the WHO European Technical Advisory Group of Experts (ETAGE) on Immunisation. He is an investigator and/or provides consultative advice on clinical trials and studies of COVID-19 vaccines produced by AstraZeneca, Janssen, Valneva, Pfizer and Sanofi and of other vaccines from these and other manufacturers including GSK, VPI, Takeda and Bionet Asia. He receives no personal remuneration or benefits for any of this work. SNF acts on behalf of University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust as an Investigator and/or providing consultative advice on clinical trials and studies of COVID-19 and other vaccines funded or sponsored by vaccine manufacturers including Janssen, Pfizer, AstraZeneca, GlaxoSmithKline, Novavax, Seqirus, Sanofi, Medimmune, Merck and Valneva vaccines and antimicrobials. He receives no personal financial payment for this work.Clinical TrialClinicalTrials.gov NCT04671017Funding StatementThis study was funded by the Department of Health and Social Care, UK The funder had no role in the study design, implementation or analysisAuthor DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:The study was approved in the UK by the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (43185/0002/001-0001) and the London, Brent ethics committee ref 20/HRA/5205.All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesData available on request