RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Cognition-oriented treatments and physical exercise on cognitive function in Huntington’s disease: Protocol for systematic review
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2021.08.12.21261956
DO 10.1101/2021.08.12.21261956
A1 Huynh, Katharine
A1 Nategh, Leila
A1 Jamadar, Sharna
A1 Georgiou-Karistianis, Nellie
A1 Lampit, Amit
YR 2021
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/08/13/2021.08.12.21261956.abstract
AB Introduction Cognitive impairments are prevalent in Huntington’s disease (HD), occurring many years prior to clinical diagnosis and are the most impactful on quality of life of patients. Cognitive interventions and exercise have been found to be efficacious in improving cognitive function in several clinical populations (e.g., older adults with mild cognitive impairment and dementia). However, the utility of cognitive interventions has not been systematically reviewed in HD. This systematic review aims to examine the efficacy of cognitive and physical interventions on cognitive function in HD.Methods Electronic databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO, CENTRAL) were searched through till 10 May 2021 for interventional studies investigating the effect of cognition-oriented treatments and physical exercise on cognitive function in individuals with HD, compared to any control or no control. The primary outcome is change on objective measures of cognition. Additional outcomes include change in psychosocial, functional and neuroimaging measures. Variations of effects based on population and study factors will be considered. Risk of bias will be assessed using the Cochrane RoB 2 tool and ROBINS-I tool. Where appropriate, outcomes will be pooled using random-effects meta-analyses, heterogeneity will be examined using tau2 and I2 statistics, and moderators will be examined using meta-regression models.Discussion This review will systematically evaluate the efficacy of cognitive and physical interventions on improving cognitive function in HD. The eligibility criteria and planned analyses will allow for a comprehensive assessment of certainty in the evidence that will inform future trials and clinical practice.Registration This protocol was registered on PROSPERO (CRD42021259152).Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementNo funding was acquired for this manuscript. Jamadar is supported by an Australian National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) Fellowship (APP1174164).Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:N/AAll necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesData sharing is not applicable to this manuscript as no new data were created or analyzed.