RT Journal Article SR Electronic T1 “At that moment, understanding the donation is crucial to make a decision”: A qualitative study exploring the process of postmortem brain tissue donation after suicide JF medRxiv FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press SP 2021.08.10.21261758 DO 10.1101/2021.08.10.21261758 A1 Padoan, Carolina Stopinski A1 Garcia, Lucas França A1 Crespo, Kleber Cardoso A1 Longaray, Vanessa Kenne A1 Martini, Murilo A1 Contessa, Julia Carmargo A1 Kapczinski, Flávio A1 de Oliveira, Francine Hehn A1 Goldim, José Roberto A1 da Silva Magalhães, Pedro Vieira YR 2021 UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/08/10/2021.08.10.21261758.abstract AB Background The direct examination of postmortem brain tissue can provide valuable help in refining knowledge on the pathophysiology and genetics of neuropsychiatric disorders. Obtaining postmortem consent for the donation of brain tissue after death by suicide can be difficult, as families may be overwhelmed by a violent and unexpected death. Examining the process of brain donation can inform on how the request can best be conducted, examining the existing barriers and enhancing communication, to the benefit of proxy donors.Methods This is a qualitative study, in which we employed in-depth interviews to investigate the donation process. Family members of decedents who were eligible for brain tissue donation were asked to consider the donation; irrespective of their decision, they were invited for an interview on the donation process at least 2 months after the suicide. Data collection and analyses were carried out according to a grounded theory framework, and collection, coding, and theorization occurred simultaneously.Findings Forty-one people participated in this study — 32 family members who had consented to donation and 9 who refused it. Five key themes emerged from our data analysis: the context of the families of potential donors, the invitation to talk to the research team, the experience with the request protocol, the participants’ assessment of the experience, and their participation in the study as an opportunity to heal. We arranged the main categories around 3 central stages of the experience described by participants: before the donation request, the request, and after the request.Conclusions The participants indicated that a brain donation request that is respectful and tactful can be made without adding to the family distress brought on by suicide and is viewed in a highly positive lens in the months following the event. Having an adequate understanding of tissue donation for research was crucial for satisfactory decision-making. Meeting with the donation team was considered a chance to talk to mental health professionals about suicide. Pondering brain donation was seen as an opportunity to transform the meaning of the death and invest it with a modicum of solace for being able to contribute to research.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementProfessor Magalhaes is supported by a National Council for Scientific and Technological Development, CNPq productivity fellowship. This work was supported by a grant from CNPq to professor Magalhaes. This work was supported by Fundo de Incentivo a Pesquisa e Eventos (FIPE) from Hospital de Clinicas de Porto Alegre, UFRGS. Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:This work was approved by The Comite de Etica em Pesquisa do Hospital de Clinicas de Porto Alegre(Research Ethics Committee)under the protocol number 09053912.9.0000.5327. The Hospital de Clinicas de Porto Alegre is registered in The Office for Human Research Protections: IORG0000588. The Comite de Etica em Pesquisa do Hospital de Clinicas de Porto Alegre (Research Ethics Committee) is registered in The Office for Human Research Protections: IRB 00000921Federalwide Assurance. The Comite de Etica em Pesquisa do Hospital de Clinicas de Porto Alegre is certified by The U.S. Department of Health & Human Services Protection of Human Subjects: FWA00002409. All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesThe data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author, upon reasonable request.