RT Journal Article SR Electronic T1 Predictive Structured-Unstructured Interactions in EHR Models: A Case Study of Suicide Prediction JF medRxiv FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press SP 2021.08.10.21261831 DO 10.1101/2021.08.10.21261831 A1 Bayramli, Ilkin A1 Castro, Victor A1 Barak-Corren, Yuval A1 Madsen, Emily M. A1 Nock, Matthew K. A1 Smoller, Jordan W. A1 Reis, Ben Y. YR 2021 UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/08/10/2021.08.10.21261831.abstract AB Clinical risk prediction models powered by electronic health records (EHRs) are becoming increasingly widespread in clinical practice. With suicide-related mortality rates rising in recent years, it is becoming increasingly urgent to understand, predict, and prevent suicidal behavior. Here, we compare the predictive value of structured and unstructured EHR data for predicting suicide risk. We find that Naive Bayes Classifier (NBC) and Random Forest (RF) models trained on structured EHR data perform better than those based on unstructured EHR data. An NBC model trained on both structured and unstructured data yields similar performance (AUC = 0.743) to an NBC model trained on structured data alone (0.742, p = 0.668), while an RF model trained on both data types yields significantly better results (AUC = 0.903) than an RF model trained on structured data alone (0.887, p<0.001), likely due to the RF model’s ability to capture interactions between the two data types. To investigate these interactions, we propose and implement a general framework for identifying specific structured-unstructured feature pairs whose interactions differ between case and non-case cohorts, and thus have the potential to improve predictive performance and increase understanding of clinical risk. We find that such feature pairs tend to capture heterogeneous pairs of general concepts, rather than homogeneous pairs of specific concepts. These findings and this framework can be used to improve current and future EHR-based clinical modeling efforts.Competing Interest StatementDr Smoller reported serving as an unpaid member of the Bipolar/Depression Research Community Advisory Panel of 23andMe and a member of the Leon Levy Foundation Neuroscience Advisory Board, and receiving an honorarium for an internal seminar at Biogen Inc. Dr Nock receives textbook royalties from Macmillan and Pearson publishers and has been a paid consultant in the past year for Microsoft and for a legal case regarding a death by suicide. He is an unpaid scientific advisor for TalkLife and Empatica.Funding StatementThis work was supported in part by a gift from the Tommy Fuss Fund and R01MH117599 (Drs. Smoller and Reis) from the National Institute of Mental Health.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:This research was approved by the Mass General Brigham Institutional Review Board, along with an IRB reliance agreement from the Boston Childrens Hospital Institutional Review Board.All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesThe data used in this study cannot be made publicly available due to restrictions relating to the use of electronic health record data.