RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 A multidimensional cross-sectional analysis of COVID-19 seroprevalence among a police officer cohort: The PoliCOV-19 study
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2021.08.09.21261789
DO 10.1101/2021.08.09.21261789
A1 Sendi, Parham
A1 Baldan, Rossella
A1 Thierstein, Marc
A1 Widmer, Nadja
A1 Gowland, Peter
A1 Gahl, Brigitta
A1 Büchi, Annina Elisabeth
A1 Güntensperger, Dominik
A1 Wider, Manon
A1 Blum, Manuel Raphael
A1 Tinguely, Caroline
A1 Maillat, Cédric
A1 Theel, Elitza S.
A1 Berbari, Elie
A1 Dijkman, Ronald
A1 Niederhauser, Christoph
YR 2021
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/08/10/2021.08.09.21261789.abstract
AB OBJECTIVE To determine the seroprevalence of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies in employees of the Cantonal Police Bern, Switzerland; to investigate individual and work-related factors associated with seropositivity; and to assess the neutralizing capacity of the antibodies of seropositive study participants.DESIGN Cross-sectional analysis of a cohort study.SETTING Wearing face masks was made mandatory for employees of the police during working hours at the rise of the second wave of the pandemic in mid-October 2020. Protests and police fieldwork provided a high exposure environment for SARS-CoV-2 infections. The investigation was performed prior to initiation of a vaccine programme. Study participants were invited for serological testing of SARS-CoV-2 and to complete questionnaires on sociodemographic, work and health-related questions.PARTICIPANTS 978 police personnel working in four different geographic districts, representing 35% of the entire staff, participated from February to March 2021.MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Seroprevalence of anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies in February to March 2021, geographic and work-related risk factors for seropositivity, and serum neutralization titres towards the wild-type SARS-CoV-2 spike protein (expressing D614G) and the alpha and beta variants.RESULTS Seroprevalence was 12.9% (126 of 978 employees). It varied by geographic region within the canton; ranged from 9% to 13% in three regions, including the city; and was 22% in Bernese Seeland/Jura. Working in the latter region was associated with higher odds for seropositivity (odds ratio 2.38, 95% confidence interval 1.28 to 4.44, P=0.006). Job roles with mainly office activity were associated with a lower risk of seropositivity (0.33, 0.14 to 0.77, P=0.010). Most seropositive employees (67.5%) reported having had coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) 3 months or longer prior to serological testing, and the proportion of agreement between positive nasopharyngeal test results and seroconversion was 95% to 97%. Among reported symptoms, new loss of smell or taste was the best discriminator for seropositivity (odds ratio 52.4, 30.9 to 89.0, P<0.001). Compliance with mask wearing during working hours was 100%, and 45% of all seropositive versus 5% of all seronegative participants (P<0.001) reported having had contact with a proven COVID-19 case living in the same household. The level of serum antibody titres correlated well with neutralization capacity. Antibodies derived from natural SARS-CoV-2 infection effectively neutralized the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein (expressing D614G), but were less effective against the alpha and beta variants. A regression model demonstrated that anti-spike antibodies had higher odds for neutralization than did anti-nucleocapsid protein antibodies.CONCLUSIONS Seroprevalence in the pre-vaccinated police cohort was similar to that reported in the general population living in the same region. The high compliance with mask wearing and the low proportion of seroconversion after contact with a presumed or proven COVID-19 case during working hours imply that personal protective equipment is effective and that household contacts are the leading transmission venues. The level of serum antibody titres, in particular that of anti-spike antibodies, correlated well with neutralization capacity. Low antibody titres were not effective against the alpha and beta variants.WHAT IS ALREADY KNOWN ON THIS TOPICThe seroprevalence of anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies in the general population shows variations, depending on the geographic location of investigated study participants.Social distancing by avoiding crowds and maintaining a distance of 6 feet from others when in public are recommended. These recommendations are not realistic for security personnel and employees of a police department.Preventive strategies for individuals in a health care setting are warranted and effective to reduce potential exposures. The effect of preventive strategies on individuals working for the police force has not been investigated.WHAT THIS STUDY ADDSThe study suggests that the overall seroprevalence of anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies among police officers is not higher than that in the general population, despite presumed higher exposure (e.g., public protests).Compliance with use of personal protective equipment among police officers was very high. The study results suggested that household contacts, rather than exposure during working hours, is the main source for viral transmission.Anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies derived from natural infection demonstrated good neutralization capacity towards strains that epidemiologically likely caused the infection, but moderate to poor neutralization capacity towards the alpha and beta variant.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Clinical TrialNCT04643444Funding StatementThe study was funded in part by the Cantonal Police of Bern, Bern, Switzerland. This funding party had no influence in the study design, interpretation of results, and generation of the manuscript. The Institute for Infectious Diseases of the University of Bern and the Interregional Blood Transfusion Swiss Red Cross, Bern, Switzerland, supported the study by providing working hours of their employees specifically for this study and by providing material and consumables at cost or for free. The manufacturer of the ECLIA tests provided no funding for this study.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:The study was approved by the Cantonal Research Ethics Commission of Bern, Switzerland (ID-2020-02650).All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesRequests for additional data and analytic scripts used in this study should be emailed to PS (Parham.Sendi{at}ifik.unibe.ch).